One of the clips from my pinhead and Patriots series that I just started on Rumble. Trump does not care about protecting our constitutional rights, he doesn't care about our value set forth by the Uni... View MoreOne of the clips from my pinhead and Patriots series that I just started on Rumble. Trump does not care about protecting our constitutional rights, he doesn't care about our value set forth by the United States Constitution. He wants to violate our second and our 14th amendment, and he says so pretty clearly right here him and his wicked b**** of the West Pam Bondi...
Don't worry I'm fighting to make this type of stuff illegal in the federal court right now in the Eastern district sixth circuit Detroit. It's the federal court so it would change the laws for at least the 6th district if not the nation
If you're a real Patriot follow my rumble and check in on my case from time to time see how it's going. https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/57780577/Jarrus_et_al_v_Governor_of_Michigan_et_al
🚨 New Series Launch 🚨
This week on the Mansplaining Mike Show we kicked off a brand-new series: “Trump: Pinhead or Patriot?” 🇺🇸
Each episode we’ll be breaking down Trump’s record issue by issue—what... View More🚨 New Series Launch 🚨
This week on the Mansplaining Mike Show we kicked off a brand-new series: “Trump: Pinhead or Patriot?” 🇺🇸
Each episode we’ll be breaking down Trump’s record issue by issue—what he promised, what he actually did, and whether he lived up to the hype.
The first installment focused strictly on the First and Second Amendments. Did Trump keep the same fire for free speech and gun rights, and foreign aid that he had on the campaign trail? Or did his actions tell a different story? We put it to the test—and gave our verdict.,
👉 Watch the full episode and drop your own verdict in the comments: Pinhead or Patriot?
https://rumble.com/v6zvmvs-trump-pinheaad-or-patriot-ep-1st-and-2nd-amendment.html
#MansplainingMike #Trump #PinheadOrPatriot #FirstAmendment #SecondAmendment #2A #FreeSpeech #GunRights #ShallNotBeInfringed #AmericaFirst #PatriotOrPinhead #ConstitutionalRights #PoliticalTruth #WeThePeople #ProtectThe2A #LibertyOrDeath #UnapologeticConservative #FightForFreedom #TruthOverTribes #MakeAmericaFreeAgain #PatriotVoice #MAGA #DontTreadOnMe #redwhiteandblue
Does the Holocaust Give Cover for What’s Happening to Palestinians?
Written by mansplaining Mike
I came across something Charles Manson once said that made me stop and think. Now, don’t get me wrong... View MoreDoes the Holocaust Give Cover for What’s Happening to Palestinians?
Written by mansplaining Mike
I came across something Charles Manson once said that made me stop and think. Now, don’t get me wrong — Manson was a madman, not someone anyone should look up to. But sometimes even madmen say things that force uncomfortable questions.
Manson suggested that some groups build power by leaning into their role as victims. That thought led me to wonder: Would Israel be able to do what it’s doing to Palestinians if it weren’t for the memory of the Holocaust?
Think about it. Every time international outrage grows over bombings in Gaza or the endless occupation of the West Bank, what comes back? The reminder: “Never forget. Never again.” And yes, the Holocaust was real, horrific, and one of the darkest crimes in human history. No sane person denies that.
But here’s the hard part: does that history now get used as a shield for Israel’s government? Do the horrors of the past give today’s leaders a kind of immunity — a way to silence critics by accusing them of antisemitism the second they speak up for Palestine?
Because if that’s the case, then we’re watching tragedy upon tragedy. One group’s suffering in the past is being used to justify another people’s suffering today. And that’s a cycle of victimization and violence that should make every moral person uncomfortable.
So I’ll leave it with this question: If there had been no Holocaust, would the world let Israel get away with what it’s doing to Palestinians? Or is the story of victimhood what keeps it untouchable?
What do you think?
200 Billion for Non-Citizens While Both Parties Keep Selling Out America
The White House admits it themselves: Democrats are pushing a proposal that would pour nearly $200 billion over the next decad... View More200 Billion for Non-Citizens While Both Parties Keep Selling Out America
The White House admits it themselves: Democrats are pushing a proposal that would pour nearly $200 billion over the next decade into healthcare for illegal immigrants and other non-citizens. That’s enough to fully fund the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) — which exists to help American kids — with billions left over. Instead, they want it for people who broke our laws to get here.
---
Democrats Put Illegals First
The breakdown is staggering:
$91.4 billion: Obamacare subsidies for non-citizens.
$34.6 billion: California’s loophole extending Medicaid to illegal immigrants.
$28.2 billion: Enhanced Medicaid payments for emergency care to illegals.
$27.3 billion: A “special rule” in Obamacare carved out just for immigrants.
$11.3 billion: Medicaid and Medicare funding for non-citizens combined.
That’s $192.8 billion ripped away from American families, seniors, veterans, and children — given to people who shouldn’t even be here in the first place.
This isn’t compassion. This is betrayal.
---
Trump and the GOP: Israel First, Not America First
But here’s the truth most Republicans don’t want to hear: Trump is no different when it comes to selling out Americans. While Democrats are focused on giving your tax dollars to illegal immigrants, Trump is laser-focused on sending your money overseas — billions and billions to Israel.
Trump likes to say “America First,” but when it comes time to make the calls, it’s Israel first. And the Democrats? They do both — shovel billions to Israel while also handing billions more to illegal immigrants here at home.
So ask yourself: where’s the party that actually puts Americans first? Where’s the party that says, “No, we’re not giving $200 billion to illegals, and no, we’re not sending endless billions to Israel”? Neither side is saying it.
---
The Two-Wing Scam
This is the real game in Washington. Democrats buy future voters with welfare for illegals. Republicans buy influence and donor support by giving endless aid to Israel. Both wings of the bird feed off taxpayers while American families are left scraping by.
Meanwhile:
American kids are priced out of healthcare.
Veterans wait in line at the VA.
Seniors choose between groceries and prescriptions.
Workers get taxed harder just to fund people and countries that aren’t even American.
It’s the same pattern over and over: Citizens last.
---
The Bottom Line
Democrats want to spend nearly $200 billion on illegal immigrants. Trump and Republicans want to keep funneling billions overseas to Israel. Different slogans, same betrayal.
Until Americans demand a real Citizens First agenda, both parties will keep using your paycheck to bankroll everyone except you.
The Funeral That Became a Rally (And Why That’s So Disturbing)
Witnessing what passed for “Charlie Kirk’s funeral” has been deeply unsettling — and not just for people who disagreed with his politics... View MoreThe Funeral That Became a Rally (And Why That’s So Disturbing)
Witnessing what passed for “Charlie Kirk’s funeral” has been deeply unsettling — and not just for people who disagreed with his politics. The line between memorial and performance was erased. In place of quiet grief and private remembrance, we got fireworks, fundraising pitches, celebrity speeches, and a stage more suited to a campaign rally than a funeral.
When Mourning Becomes a Show
A memorial service was held September 21 in Glendale, Arizona at State Farm Stadium, drawing tens of thousands. What should have been a solemn, private moment for family and close friends became a theatrical production. Pyrotechnics went off as Erika Kirk and Donald Trump took the stage. The stage was lit up with sparklers, music, and loud cheers.
The organizers defended these choices. According to Andrew Kolvet, Kirk’s spokesman, “our staff loves the effect … Charlie loved it. We do not grieve the way the world grieves.” The message: This is how they want to mourn — with spectacle, with energy, with public display.
But grieving isn’t supposed to be a performance. Funerals exist — ideally — for the family’s private sorrow, for close friends to have a moment of introspection, and for attendees to honor the departed with dignity. When the line is crossed into spectacle, grief becomes co-opted.
Speeches That Served an Agenda
The event featured numerous high-profile speeches: Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Stephen Miller, and others. These weren’t short tributes. Trump’s eulogy ran about 40 minutes, during which he wove in political talking points — crime in Chicago, tariffs, national destiny — shifting from personal remembrance to campaigning. Much of the tone was triumphant, painting Kirk as a martyr for patriotism and faith.
When the dead become symbols, the mourning becomes hollow. The grief of a family becomes secondary to the ambitions of factions.
Fundraising as Eulogy
If the speeches weren’t enough, fundraising overtures followed closely behind. Turning Point USA saw a surge in donations immediately after Kirk’s death. The widow, Erika Kirk, launched fundraising campaigns and appeals as part of carrying on his legacy. The event itself reportedly held voter registration booths and sold merchandise — red hats emblazoned “KIRK” among them.
It’s not inherently wrong to fundraise, or even ask for support after a tragic death. But when that becomes part of the funeral pageantry — when grief, public mourning, and political fundraising blur into one — it cheapens the emotional integrity of loss.
Why It Feels Gross (Because It Is)
1. Erosion of Private Grief
The family’s right to a solemn, quiet moment was sacrificed for a massive public event. The voices that should’ve mattered most — close relatives, old friends — got drowned out by megaphones, cameras, and politics.
2. Grief as a Means, Not an End
When a funeral doubles as a campaign rally, grief becomes instrumentalized. It’s a tool to mobilize, to recruit, to galvanize supporters. The deceased becomes a brand, not a person.
3. Mixed Messages = Desecration
Fireworks, loud music, political speeches — these send a message that grief must be loud, triumphant, and mobilizing. But grief is also quiet, messy, contradictory, and unglamorous.
4. Controlling the Narrative
In such a setting, the narrative about Kirk was tightly controlled. He becomes sainted, martyrized, unassailable. That leaves little room for nuance, for critique, or for complex discussion of his life and ideas.
A Better Standard for Mourning
If we accept that public figures may warrant public memorials, we still need guardrails. A funeral can include a public service, but the tone must remain respectful of private mourning. Fundraising should be clearly separate. Speeches should focus on memory, not mobilization. And spectacle — fireworks, light shows — has its place in celebrations, not farewells.
What we witnessed was not just a funeral gone over the top; it was a funeral hijacked by politics. That’s not tribute. That’s optics. And it’s deeply disrespectful — both to the dead and to the mourners.
Looking to sell. 2011 around 8500 miles. No issues. Located in niles mi. Asking 8500.00. Thanks for looking
page=2&profile_user_id=510506&year=&month=
Load More