Vaccine expert Dr. Sherri Tenpenny observes:
"This study was implemented by the Cochrane Collaboration, an international, independent research group. We're typically told by the CDC each year that th... View MoreVaccine expert Dr. Sherri Tenpenny observes:
"This study was implemented by the Cochrane Collaboration, an international, independent research group. We're typically told by the CDC each year that the seasonal flu vaccine is 40% to 60% effective. The Cochrane reviewers found it to be 1% effective - "100 people need to be vaccinated to avoid one set of influenza symptoms." That's seems so absurd, it's almost difficult for *me* to believe!
They told us the flu vaccine is 99% ineffective. Moreover, acknowledging that some of the data they used were from vaccine manufacturers and therefore likely biased, they go on to say that that estimate may be optimistic. Frankly, I don't see much room for optimism.
They cite as a confounding factor in their overall estimate the fact that the "harms evidence base" for the flu vaccine is limited. Not surprisingly, no mention was made of the benefits evidence base. In a previous flu-related post on this page a woman commented that she used to get the flu every year, like clockwork. She'd get sick, go to the doctor, get the Rx du jour and recover, only to go through it again the following year - until one year, when she decided to let the illness play out, sans MD, sans Rx. That was years ago, she said, and she hadn't had the flu since.
Word to the wise. ;-)"
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4/abstract
Precursor To The Mark? A
Researchers have found a way to leave a
THE BATTLE FOR HUMANITY Dr Carrie Madej
Dr Carrie Madej explains how dangerous the COVID-19 vaccine may be, if the proposed technologies are accepted. It could mean the end of our freedom and autonomy.
Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1764/6018217
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment a systematic review
AbstractObjective. to review the evidence from studies relating SARS-CoV-2 culture with the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
I found the following article having some text identical to that in the snapshot of the original text provided here which indicates 57 percent loss in sperm count among Moderna's trial subjects.
ht... View MoreI found the following article having some text identical to that in the snapshot of the original text provided here which indicates 57 percent loss in sperm count among Moderna's trial subjects.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/11/fever-aches-pfizer-moderna-jabs-aren-t-dangerous-may-be-intense-some
At the bottom of the revised article is the following note:
"*Correction, 20 November, 3:45 p.m.: This article has been updated to reflect that severe vaccine side effects are defined as preventing daily activities, and that Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna hope to provide vaccines for 35 million people worldwide by the end of December."
So it seems they got rid of the admission that it causes 57 percent reduction in sperm count, since they have restricted the definition of "severe vaccine side effect" to that which prevents daily activities. Of course massive sperm count reduction doesn't fit that category.
Pretty sneaky, callous and irresponsible.
Science just discovers what was written in the Torah.
https://www.lifegivinglinen.com/linen-study.html
I had heard about this, but I didn't know the full details. ... View MoreScience just discovers what was written in the Torah.
https://www.lifegivinglinen.com/linen-study.html
I had heard about this, but I didn't know the full details.
If I could do it again, think I might have considered buying running outfits made of organic cotton or merino wool instead of all the high-tech nylons. Maybe they don't wick away moisture as quickly as the polyester microfibres, but surely there are advantages.
Or maybe the takeaway is that when we aren't exercising in hot or hostile weather conditions, we should wear clothing made of one-hundred percent organic cotton, linen, wool, hemp, or other natural fibre.
What do you think?
YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Diseases come from environmental and dietary causes as well as our thoughts and beliefs. Lifestyle modifications help us to heal.
So, who are you??Hmmm. Let me think.?I'm the one that understands the game and won't play by unethical, unlawful and bad-science-justified rules that are not about our health, but are about manipulati... View MoreSo, who are you??Hmmm. Let me think.?I'm the one that understands the game and won't play by unethical, unlawful and bad-science-justified rules that are not about our health, but are about manipulating us to submit.?I guess they didn't have room for that 5th box on the poster...??Maybe it's on the back of the poster??Only to be found by lateral thinkers...
Philosophers would say classify this sort of ethical approach as an example of consequentialism, the motto of which is "the greatest good for the greatest amoint of people". Thus seems to be the ethi... View MorePhilosophers would say classify this sort of ethical approach as an example of consequentialism, the motto of which is "the greatest good for the greatest amoint of people". Thus seems to be the ethical approach favoured by the global elite such as the Bilderbergs. However, this sort of ethics can only be defended based on the claim that the vaccine is more beneficial that other available options, largely free of risk, and necessary. Of course the individuals whose rights are violated must largely be ignored to justify most such consequentialism-based approaches. The fact that the selction of such individuals will not be so random that the global elite need to worry that one of them will become lab rats - such a fact exposes such consequentialism-based aproaches as prejudicial and possibly genocidal.
https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/20/humans-to-be-deliberately-infected-with-covid-in-uk-to-speed-up-vaccine-13449255/
Humans to be deliberately infected with Covid in UK to speed up vaccine
The UK is set to become the first country to deliberately infect people with the disease in a 'human challenge' trials.
Dinosaur collagen has been Carbon 14 dated to be like that of mammoths putting deep-time narratives in doubt. Carbon 14 should be undetectable past 60,000 years but the readings is far short of the th... View MoreDinosaur collagen has been Carbon 14 dated to be like that of mammoths putting deep-time narratives in doubt. Carbon 14 should be undetectable past 60,000 years but the readings is far short of the theorized depletion levels.
Another thing? There are no secular scientists making counter-comments, counter-arguments, or counter-test results that appears in PEER REVIEW with carbon 14 testing and dinosaur tissue/collagen in the same context in ANY paper. Complete silence. It shows fear and knowledge it is not evolution-friendly with the results. Go ahead and web search it. Only Christians who are scientists have had them tested by not telling the accelerator mass spectrometry labs [AMS] what they were dating.
Several AMS around the world blind-tested dinosaur collagen samples including University of Georgia that was sent by the Hugh Miller team. In the table in the link below look for the 'GX' designation for their results as an example.
The common skeptic 'refutation' of 'they don't test them for Carbon 14 when they're that old' is circular and is a non-point. There is nothing stopping it. If it was an actual legit 'refutation' there would be scientists saying why and what THEIR Carbon 14 results were and be in peer-review papers with dinosaur collagen in the SAME context.
The other common 'refutation' by skeptics is 'it is contamination'. That is not a legit refutation because the inventor and Noble Science Prize winner says it is IMPOSSIBLE to falsify a Carbon 14 test on collagen. Why? There is a collagen filtration method that purifies it to being 100% collagen. Then it goes thru a test to be sure it is pure with no, as a for instance, bacteria or human DNA in it.
So there is the challenge for our skeptics. Web search for peer-review counter-statements or statements to Hugh Miller's obtained test results. Keep your refutations to links in our 21st century. If you like to attack the source or the person instead of engaging the evidence inside my link, it would show our open-minded spectators your lack of critical thinking skills and the need of rescue excuses because of your weak position. That will be great!
via Robert Ackerman, whose comments I have copied here
https://www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
page=2&callback_module_id=groups&callback_item_id=659&year=&month=
Load More
