I do not agree with the ruling of the court pertaining to this subject in the manner of the findings that has been concluded on the aspects that these companies are responsible for those who have rend... View MoreI do not agree with the ruling of the court pertaining to this subject in the manner of the findings that has been concluded on the aspects that these companies are responsible for those who have rendered the lack of individual responsibility. Let me elaborate upon this subject.
You can come to the understanding that these institutions are in business to advertise on a broad spectrum massive scale to all age levels from young to old. With that said, whom is ultimately responsible for this particular subject?
Is it not the responsibly of the parents that are the individuals who claim they are responsible for their children in every aspect of their upbringing? Or are they only responsible outside the boundaries of electronic devices,and the social platforms somehow become the responsible source of anyone below the age of what is to be considered as an adult?
Where is the line drawn? Is there a line? If there is such a line then to whom is the first? The parent or the company? Both can not hold the first, for there can only be one. These parents who have deflected their responsibly are laying their failures at the feet of the corporations they allowed their children to be connected to. The prenatal responsibilities have no boundaries. Being a parent has no excuses for when they believe that they hold no responsibility for what their children do with what they allowed their children to do.
At any point in time I can choose to enforce whatever I wish on the decisions I want whenever I want in what I choose for my children.
Am I in defense of these companies? In this case I absolutely am. However, I must convey in a very common sense manner. Look at to what we are talking about here.
What responsibility can these corporations possibly be responsible for?
They are in business to make money. How do they make money? They offer content to entice people who use their platforms to sell their products.
Therefore I do not agree with these so-called parents or the confines of the court who are using failure of the responsible parents who have ignored and holds their own guilt that has harmed their children. The greatest and most powerful word as a responsible parent is the word NO and these people are the individuals who have chosen their own failure.
So in conclusion, blame yourself not the individuals who are offering a service.
Question of the day. Are we worthy to stone others whom are within our presence out of what some have grown thirsty to become much like the Biblical day's of the Gentile and Jew?
Apparently in many r... View MoreQuestion of the day. Are we worthy to stone others whom are within our presence out of what some have grown thirsty to become much like the Biblical day's of the Gentile and Jew?
Apparently in many regard, I hold the same questions as Paul. Let us not forget that Paul was in no manner bringing condemnation, he simply sought-after opening the eyes of others to see that they were acting no differently than to whom they were bringing conviction against. Remember this as well. Just because you can, doesn't mean that you should. You might be standing someday before the Creator and learning that you're past against others earned you a much different place for eternity.
Romans 2:1–3 (NKJV)
1 Therefore you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you are who judge, for in whatever you judge another you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things. 2 But we know that the judgment of God is according to truth against those who practice such things. 3 And do you think this, O man, you who judge those practicing such things, and doing the same, that you will escape the judgment of God?
What I suspect this is, is two different things. The first is gouging and the second is corporate deep state retaliation against the administration. An angel of attack to try to make the American citi... View MoreWhat I suspect this is, is two different things. The first is gouging and the second is corporate deep state retaliation against the administration. An angel of attack to try to make the American citizenry turn against Trump. Lastly Trump must destroy the entire spectrum of the Iranian IRGC and unleash the wardogs and capture full control over the waterway of the Hormuz strait. Anything less will only result in the continuation of fuel prices without end until nothing will move. This will be a complete collapse on an economic level since the crash of the 1920s. Immediate action must happen and force the power brokers to end this Immediately.
BREAKING NEWS! THOUSANDS OF TRUCK DRIVERS UPSET ABOUT PRICE GOUGING AT $8 A GALLON
BREAKING NEWS! THOUSANDS OF TRUCK DRIVERS UPSET ABOUT PRICE GOUGING AT $8 A GALLON
Send your trucking videos to
muthatruckernews@gmail.com
"Verify freight brokers before you load. Use CheckMyLoad t
These are the reasons why we need to train people better than allowing mistakes that should not happen. The 34,560 is the issue. 560lbs over weight is not acceptable. Especially when you don't have an... View MoreThese are the reasons why we need to train people better than allowing mistakes that should not happen. The 34,560 is the issue. 560lbs over weight is not acceptable. Especially when you don't have anything left to make adjustments. So here I go again, detention time. 🙄
page=2&profile_user_id=491186&year=&month=
Load More
