Revolutions of power do not have to be violent. Take the U.S. gov't for example. Today, the power in the Executive Branch has been completely taken over by a private group for the purposes of subverti... View MoreRevolutions of power do not have to be violent. Take the U.S. gov't for example. Today, the power in the Executive Branch has been completely taken over by a private group for the purposes of subverting our Constitution, eroding our sovereignty, entangling us with alliances that are detrimental to our national security and the survival of our INDEPENDENT NATION!
This private group has only 5,000 members and this year is celebrating 100 years in existence. Any normal group involved in public policy should have had no problem reaching a million members. And these are some of the wealthiest and influential people of our society! George Soros is just one name on their list. Read the article below! It will be your introduction into understand just what we are dealing with! The CFR is a virtual "human resource agency" that pushes their 'member experts' into our federal government and sadly, very sadly, the U.S. Senate are TOTALLY silent and asleep at the wheel. Over 300 CFR members are in the highest and next to the highest positions in most of our federal agencies. You must read this article!!!
We have been taken over friends by a slow, quiet and deliberate team of globalists! A Politburo style, invitation only, secretive group.
https://thenewamerican.com/cfr-still-the-power-behind-the-throne/
CFR: Still the Power Behind the Throne - The New American
For a century, the globalist Council on Foreign Relations has been the “power behind the throne” in U.S. politics. This tradition has continued under the Biden administration. ...
Now it's up to 26K NG troops in DC.
SCOTUS issued a statement, 12/11/2020:
"The State of Texas�s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstr... View MoreSCOTUS issued a statement, 12/11/2020:
"The State of Texas�s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."
In a nut case, SCOTUS rejected the TX case because TX filed their case as "motion for leave to file a bill of complaint". However, SCOTUS signals to TX and other states that if they file their cases as "motion to file the bill of complaint", then their cases will be heard.
So, now, we await for TX and/or other states to file their cases correctly to SCOTUS again.
Continued prayers........
page=1&profile_user_id=199860&year=&month=
Load More
