Absolutely unbelievable. Nancy has shown herself to be the pinnacle of mean spitefulness combined with pure stupidity, but this takes it to a new level. Putting Swalwell as impeachment manager almost ... View MoreAbsolutely unbelievable. Nancy has shown herself to be the pinnacle of mean spitefulness combined with pure stupidity, but this takes it to a new level. Putting Swalwell as impeachment manager almost defies even being human.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pelosi-names-eric-swalwell-house-impeachment-manager?fbclid=IwAR1xG-jxotAibRw0XzUA2Wvvf6MaZq6zfM_JnqsKTlE2PZ97s_0JLfxG3J8
Pelosi Names Eric Swalwell As House Impeachment Manager
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Two early ones today. The biggest thing for me is that I am taking a new view of what's appropriate for handling this massive Dem voter fraud that's getting dangerously close to being gotten away with... View MoreTwo early ones today. The biggest thing for me is that I am taking a new view of what's appropriate for handling this massive Dem voter fraud that's getting dangerously close to being gotten away with. But I'll go to point #2 first, just because it's short, quick, and easy to get out of the way. To wit, if there is a Prez Joe and a Dem legislature that wants to forgive college loans and make college free, they DAMN sure better not practice age discrimination and not allow somebody like me to go back and get the free degrees that I deserve (and could actually understand well enough to make use of, something clearly beyond even the youthful leadership class as represented by the ignorant like of AOC and her ilk).
The other point is more fundamental, and more controversial. As this electoral campaign wound on, I considered the Dem fear-mongering about Trump resisting a transition was pure silliness. That was before I saw the unbelievable collection of ways the Dems were stealing the election. My earlier view may have been naive, but it was naive only in that I never dreamed they would be doing the degree of cheating they have and are doing. And how deep and exhaustive is their network of "insurance policies" (thank you, Strozk and Page, for being careless enough to put the term in our lexicon with that context), from workers at poll level to voting machines to media to political and judicial insertions making stopping any of it virtually impossible.
I think my naive earlier view overlooked one big thing when I figured that whole "watch out, Trump's going to resist" thing was ludicrous. I missed that they actually knew they were cheating so badly, could get caught, and that could made such resistance by the Trump side completely justified and not even surprising. The key, of course, is there would be no resisting a LEGITIMATE election loss, but resisting an ILLEGITIMATE one might be the only appropriate action to maintain any semblance of governmental integrity in our country.
I have been highly critical of the rioting tactics of BLM/Antifa. They have destroyed much of our country, all for a premise based on the proven lie of "Hands up, don't shoot" and everything that's sprung from its continued dissemination despite it's having been utterly disproved. But even if those riots were based on a false premise, the rioters certainly BELIEVED, MORE than wholeheartedly, in the faulty premises that spawned their destructive "protestations." If those actions were deemed justifiable for a bogus underlying reason, how much more justifiable would similar tactics be for something legitimate like stopping stealing an election, preventing an illegitimate taking of control of our government?
I don't like where this is going, but it's clear what the "where" is where it's going. I just hope we're prepared for it. The right side of the aisle, of the country, has very little experience with "handling" matters this way. But the old, tried and true, civil ways of defending truth and liberty being thwarted by these myriad "insurance policies" may ultimately be forcing their hand. Better get good at it, and braver than they've been in anybody's living memory, fast, if fairness is to have a chance of preservation.
So often the bigger point is missed. Here are 2 examples. In this article, there are multiple actual examples of indisputable voter fraud. Not a one of these by itself is enough to put Trump over the ... View MoreSo often the bigger point is missed. Here are 2 examples. In this article, there are multiple actual examples of indisputable voter fraud. Not a one of these by itself is enough to put Trump over the hump. And the story isn't even that maybe we're not finding all of 'em, and there COULD be enough to cause that overturn if and when all might be found. To me, the big story is that there IS this much (how much, again, not the story) election fraud going on. CATCH THESE BASTARDS, penalize the hell out of them, big prison time, or that mysterious "we don't know how much we're not catching" amount will never stop growing.
Here's the link, and after it, I'll put item #2, relating to big tech trying to defend their asses in front of the Senate at this very moment.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-campaign-highlights-alleged-dead-voters-casting-ballots-in-pennsylvania_3576263.html?utm_source=share-btn-copylink&fbclid=IwAR064bNaD2GWOTo6Jpz-eiADRzGt7Or8mvfq2Le8Clv373hkWQ9XiaLuulI
OK, so Twitter and FB CEOs open with defensive pre-recorded statements highlighting all kinds of good stuff they did in this election to remove false things like fictional reports of overcrowded polling stations. OK, that's cool, nice that you did that. You're not QUITE all bad, I get it and give you that. But that has little or nothing to do with the major point, and thus is nothing more than one more in a seemingly infinite list of Dem SOP deflections away from the actual issues. The issue is that you censored one party's stuff and not the other. Including me. No matter how many false reports you removed, throttling the truth in other posts is not justified by that cleaning of a few things.
Trump Campaign Highlights Alleged Dead Voters Casting Ballots in Pennsylvania
President Donald Trump's campaign on late Wednesday highlighted several alleged cases of deceased people voting during last week's ...
There are things that on the surface seem like minor irritants, but are truly indicative of things much worse below the surface. Kind of like a mole that changes potentially indicating melanoma, thoug... View MoreThere are things that on the surface seem like minor irritants, but are truly indicative of things much worse below the surface. Kind of like a mole that changes potentially indicating melanoma, though the mole itself doesn't really hurt or cause any problem on its own. The fact that Pfizer notified Biden before Trump that they'd soon be announcing the success of their vaccine trial is one such thing. It makes no sense, and the call itself doesn't actually hurt much of anything, but it sure shows who's colluding with whom, and it doesn't get hard to figure out why. Trump has been working his butt off to get control of medical costs, and in so doing has been very tough on big pharma, wringing out as much of their excess profit as possible while still allowing them motivation for R&D, a delicate path to negotiate. One of the big failings of Obamacare was that, in order to pass it, Obama had to get in bed with big pharma and insurance companies to get their lobbies on board with the mystery program Nancy assured us would be fine even if we could only learn what was in it after it passed. Big pharma remembers who they were in bed with and who's been being tough on 'em... they're not confused as to how and where their bread will be buttered. Good riddance, Trump, hello bigger profits thanks to Biden.
page=2&profile_user_id=8262&year=&month=
Load More
