Drag to reposition your photo

T Lee Horne III

Male. Lives in Pensacola, Florida, United States. Is single.

About Me

I retired when I turned 50 years old. I am working again at 72 years old.

I started back to work at A... View More

Liked Pages1

34 Likes

CSA II: The New Confederate States of America

Company, Organization, or Institution

T Lee Horne III

Report this User

Status Update

T Lee Horne III

April 6, 2026 9:02 pm

THE CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SOUTHERN STATES Chet McAteer Compliance is Complicity: The Sacred Duty to Resist Unconstitutional Government in the Age of Tyranny In our modern era, the questio... View MoreTHE CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SOUTHERN STATES Chet McAteer Compliance is Complicity: The Sacred Duty to Resist Unconstitutional Government in the Age of Tyranny In our modern era, the question of compliance with Unconstitutional Acts by government, whether federal, state, or local, remains a foundational test of republican principles, echoing timeless concerns about the limits of authority and the duty of citizens to preserve liberty. When government exceeds its delegated powers, enacting measures that violate the explicit boundaries of the Constitution, blind obedience transforms Free Citizens into subjects and erodes the very Compact that created the government in the first place. The Principles at the heart of this dilemma emphasize that the Constitution is not a grant of unlimited power but a negative charter: it restrains government rather than granting it carte blanche, reserving all undelegated authority to the States and the People. Compliance with Unconstitutional Acts, therefore, is not a virtue of law-abiding citizenship but an abdication of the Sovereign duty to resist encroachments that undermine natural rights, federalism, and the rule of law. At its core, this perspective rests on the idea that government derives its just powers from the Consent of the Governed, as articulated in the Founding Documents, and that Consent is conditional upon fidelity to Constitutional limits. Unconstitutional Acts, such as those infringing on Free Speech, the Right to Bear Arms , due process, or the separation of powers, represent breaches of the original Compact among Sovereign States and their People. In contemporary times, examples abound: expansive federal regulations that bypass enumerated powers, surveillance programs that evade Fourth Amendment protections, or mandates that compel individual behavior without clear Constitutional warrant. The Principle here is clear: such acts are void ab initio, lacking legitimate authority, and Citizens are under no moral or legal obligation to comply with them. Submission to Tyranny under the guise of “law” inverts the American experiment, where the People are the ultimate Sovereign and government the servant. Resistance, however, must be Principled and measured, rooted in education, legal challenge, State Interposition, and cultural renewal rather than unchecked vigilantism. The underlying logic underscores that true allegiance is owed not to transient officeholders or bureaucratic decrees but to the Constitution itself as the Supreme Law of the Land. When government acts Unconstitutionally, compliance perpetuates the violation, weakening the checks and balances designed to prevent despotism; separation of powers, federalism, and the Bill of Rights as explicit prohibitions on authority. In modern practice, this manifests in movements for nullification at the State level, lawsuits invoking the Tenth Amendment, or widespread civic refusal to legitimize overreach through participation. The danger lies not in questioning authority but in the complacency that normalizes Unconstitutional governance, gradually converting a republic into an administrative State where Rights are privileges granted at the whim of the powerful. Ultimately, the Principles drawn from this tradition demand vigilance: Citizens must discern the difference between legitimate law and illegitimate fiat, rejecting the latter not out of rebellion but out of fidelity to the higher law of the Constitution. In an age of regulatory sprawl, emergency powers invoked indefinitely, and judicial interpretations that stretch textual meaning beyond recognition, unwavering compliance risks the Republic’s moral and structural foundations. The remedy lies in a renewed commitment to Constitutional literacy, State Sovereignty as a bulwark, and the understanding that liberty is preserved only when the people refuse to legitimize their own subjugation. By internalizing these truths, modern Americans can reclaim the revolutionary spirit that birthed the nation; affirming that no act of government, however clothed in legality, can override the Eternal Principles of limited government and Individual Sovereignty. In Liberty and Eternal Vigilance, C.M.McAteer October 27, 2015 References The Constitution of the United States (1787), particularly the Tenth Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Supremacy Clause (Article VI), and the Bill of Rights as explicit limits on federal power. The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and Virginia Resolutions of 1798, authored by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, which articulated that States and Citizens have a duty to judge the Constitutionality of federal acts and to resist those deemed Unconstitutional. The Federalist Papers, especially No. 78 (Alexander Hamilton on the judiciary’s limited role) and No. 33 (Hamilton on the limits of federal authority). Thomas Jefferson, “Declaration of Independence” (1776) and his letter to William Branch Giles (1825), emphasizing that “the rightful remedy” against Unconstitutional measures is Nullification by the States. James Madison, Report of 1800, defending the Virginia Resolutions and the Compact Theory of the Union. John C. Calhoun, Fort Hill Address (1831) and Disquisition on Government, expanding on State Interposition as a check on federal overreach. Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority (1867), arguing that Unconstitutional Acts void any claim to legitimate obedience. Thomas Woods, Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century (2010), applying these principles to modern regulatory and surveillance overreach. Randy E. Barnett, Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty (2013), on the original understanding of enumerated powers and the illegitimacy of acts exceeding them.

View Less

Be the first person to like this.

Recent Photos

View More Photos