Date Rightstuff
24 January 2026
Minneapolis DHS Shooting Incident – And Why It Wasn't an "Execution"
Let's cut through the hysteria and look at the confirmed facts, because the media and activists are... View MoreDate Rightstuff
24 January 2026
Minneapolis DHS Shooting Incident – And Why It Wasn't an "Execution"
Let's cut through the hysteria and look at the confirmed facts, because the media and activists are already spinning this as another "unarmed innocent" story. It wasn't. Here's the timeline based on official reports and eyewitness accounts...
✅ At approximately 9:05 AM CT on January 24, 2026, DHS law enforcement officers (including Border Patrol) were conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien with a violent assault warrant. This was a routine enforcement action – not a raid on random civilians.
✅ An armed individual (later identified as the suspect) approached the visibly marked federal agents during the active arrest. He was carrying a 9mm semi-automatic handgun, visible in bodycam and witness footage. Officers immediately attempted to disarm him for safety.
✅ The suspect violently resisted, escalating the situation into a physical struggle. DHS reports confirm he tried to use his weapon, putting officers' lives at risk. In self-defense, an agent fired shots. Medics on scene provided immediate aid, but the suspect was pronounced dead.
✅ Additional details: The man had two loaded magazines on him and no ID – raising serious red flags about intent. This wasn't a "peaceful protester" wandering by; it looks like someone prepared for confrontation and maximum harm. (See attached images: The suspect approaching agents, and the recovered 9mm Sig Sauer with extended mags – not exactly "unarmed.")
✅ After the shooting, about 200 rioters showed up, obstructing the scene and assaulting officers. Crowd control measures were deployed to protect public safety and law enforcement – not to "suppress free speech."
This wasn't random violence or "fascist overreach." It was a direct result of someone inserting themselves into a federal operation, arming up like a wannabe militia, and resisting lawful commands. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
And here's the point no one wants to admit: This man didn't have to be there. He could've protested peacefully from the sidewalk. He could've exercised his rights without a gun and without charging agents. Instead, he chose escalation – and DHS says he attempted to use his weapon first. That's not martyrdom; that's consequences.
I dare any Permit to carry American to strap on and go fight with your local police, see what happens, you won't cause you know better, he didn't know any better.
He pulled a gun on Federal Law Enforcement you fucking retard. Legal gun ownership doesn’t mean you get to do whatever you want with them. He fucked around and found out. Just like Renee Good and Who carries 2 extra magazines for self defense?
The left and media are martyring an armed radical who showed up to ambush ICE – while ignoring the real victims of illegal crime waves. If this was a conservative with a gun at a BLM riot, they'd call it terrorism.
We back the blue – and federal agents enforcing the law – because without them, chaos wins. Facts over feelings. Always.
Sources: Reuters (Jan 2026 reporting), Fox News (on-scene updates), DHS official briefing.
🇺🇸 Law matters. Process matters. Self-defense matters.
In other words, the South's Constitutional Stance was absolutely correct!
https://www.westernjournal.com/watch-dem-strategist-melts-scott-jennings-gives-history-lesson-party/
In the 1830s, the Democrats established themselves as the party of Indian Removal under President ... View Morehttps://www.westernjournal.com/watch-dem-strategist-melts-scott-jennings-gives-history-lesson-party/
In the 1830s, the Democrats established themselves as the party of Indian Removal under President Andrew Jackson.
In the years preceding the Civil War, Democrats both North and South demanded the extension of slavery into the territories. Meanwhile, the Republican Party emerged in 1854 for the sole reason of keeping slavery out of said territories.
Speaking of Republicans, Abraham Lincoln won the 1860 election after pledging to keep slavery from spreading westward and expressing moral repugnance to the institution. Southern Democrats responded to Lincoln’s campaign rhetoric by removing him from state ballots.
Why do Democrats always try to prevent voters from choosing a candidate who elitist Democrats, in this case slaveholders, despise?
Then, when Democrats lost the 1860 election, they took their toys and went home. More specifically, seven Democrat-controlled Southern states seceded from the Union before Lincoln even took office. Four more states followed shortly thereafter, joining the new Confederacy.
After the conflict, Democrats won a decades-long war of attrition in the South, ignoring constitutional amendments and relegating freed blacks to second-class citizenship.
In short, the 19th-century Democratic Party was filled with authoritarian elitists such as the former slaveholders who, in the 1870s and 1880s, wrested control of their states from the Reconstruction governments. Their descendants — Democrats all — still held power in the South by the 1960s.
Watch: Dem Strategist Melts Down When Scott Jennings Gives Her a History Lesson About Her Own Party
With his usual good nature, Jennings responded to Roginsky's gaffe by reminding her of Democrats' sordid history on race and civil rights.
Tommy Esposito
23 hours ago
·
Sooooo… Anti-ICE rioters have now SEIZED CONTROL of the road outside ICE Mireapolis, blocking vehicles to ensure occupants aren't "NAZIS" before being allowed to pass. 🤦... View MoreTommy Esposito
23 hours ago
·
Sooooo… Anti-ICE rioters have now SEIZED CONTROL of the road outside ICE Mireapolis, blocking vehicles to ensure occupants aren't "NAZIS" before being allowed to pass. 🤦🏻♂️ They are literally doing their own traffic stops on regular civilians. Not just vehicles that resemble ICE vehicles anymore, but now it’s everyone. Isn’t it crazy how the people who want no borders start making borders? 🤔 The people complaining about “random checks” are now stopping citizens for random checks. 🧐 The same people who do not want “a police state” are becoming the police state. 🤨 Just like that scheduled nationwide “walk out” for 2pm today. These (mostly) white liberals are “mad as hell” and they are “refusing to cooperate with this fascist regime” to “protect our democracy.” The majority of the people voted for this. This IS “democracy” and the sore losers who are trying to get Trump removed from office are, by definition, the actual fascists. When Biden was elected, we were forced to sit there and watch him destroy our country, while gaslighting us and telling us not to believe our lying eyes regarding the border and the highest inflation ever recorded in our lifetime at 9.1%! We didn’t try to assassinate him, impeach him every other day, or overthrow the government. No, we sat there, kept our mouths shut, and respected this country’s democratic process. And now that Trump is trying to return our country back to normal, after all of the damage Biden caused here and abroad, now they wanna remove OUR democratic pick for president! 😡 God only created 2 genders! Democrats made up the rest… and we’re no longer forced to accept that! 🫡🇺🇸
Satire:
https://www.dailyskrape.com/keith-ellison-introduces-new-legal-standard-where-laws-only-apply-if-vibes-are-wrong/
Ellison also reassured Minnesotans that churches remain protected spaces unle... View MoreSatire:
https://www.dailyskrape.com/keith-ellison-introduces-new-legal-standard-where-laws-only-apply-if-vibes-are-wrong/
Ellison also reassured Minnesotans that churches remain protected spaces unless activists need them for chanting, filming content, or building awareness through aggressive indoor yelling.
As of press time, Ellison was reportedly considering expanding the policy to cover looting, provided it is done with the correct tone and hashtags.
Keith Ellison Introduces New Legal Standard Where Laws Only Apply If Vibes Are Wrong
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison unveiled a bold new update to the justice system this week clarifying that laws are
page=1&profile_user_id=23488&year=&month=
Load More
