Drag to reposition your photo

Bill E Overly

Male. Born on November 25, 1971.

Joined Groups1

81 Members

Grassroots for Senator Mastriano

Politics and Elections

Liked Pages1

216 Likes

Wendy Bell

Politics

Bill E Overly

Report this User

Status Update

Bill E Overly shared

August 3, 2021 8:44 am

Ask Uncle Randy shared a photo

August 3, 2021 7:47 am

Jenn West

August 2, 2021 RE: States and Jurisdiction, Independent state, dependent state. For all who desire freedom and liberty, I have composed the following; ... View MoreAugust 2, 2021 RE: States and Jurisdiction, Independent state, dependent state. For all who desire freedom and liberty, I have composed the following; The “state” in the Constitution is not the lawfully created state created by the people of the state as only people and populations can erect a lawful state. The “several States” in the constitution are those erected on the annexed lands which became federal lands for “defence” purposes, and the “particular States” are the states that gave the land, allowing for the annexation of the lands and those states are in a “confederacy” under the Articles of Confederation. The idea that a federal state, a state within a state makes more sense once properly applied, this is not a “perception” on my part this is an actual understanding of the original intention of the Organic Laws of America. The “several States” CANNOT become “independent states” “Independent states are sovereign states” therefore those states on the annexed lands, or that is the federal lands are the “dependent states” created by the federal government and have no sovereignty and are for “defence” purposes and are called “several States,” being without sovereignty they CANNOT enter into agreements, they cannot erect themsevels into independent states, they cannot individually tax, create alliences with foreign nations, erect a state within it, cannot leave the union (become an independent state), cannot join any league/confederacy. The constitution did NOT make the states that created it, dependent states under the authority of the Constitution, it simply allowed for the creation of dependent states within the independent states. The independent states are “The United States of America” and the dependent states are “the United States.” The President, Congress and “supreme Court” are confined within the jurisdiction of “the United States.” The Articles of Confederation were never repealed, there is NO repealing clause for it, the Constitution is simply, a statute for running the dependent states. Therefore, the federal government and all of its instrumentalities are and have been acting outside of their jurisdictions, without proper authority, in fraud, illegally, unlawfully, outside of the constitution, etc. There has been an effort to alter the perception of the American people I believe beginning with the Lincoln Administration when they used the military to take over the lawful state confederacies and make them into legal states. All monies, properties, etc. should be restored, as that is the right thing to do. Anything congress does outside of the constitution, they lacked power to do, they do not have power to act outside of the constitution, unconstitutional acts are without authority, they are without jurisdiction, therefore they are “void” not “voidable” meaning it is not required that a court void an unconstitutional act, it is on its face, void, as if it never were. There can be no act of congress that repeals, replaces, does away with, or any other thing outside of the constitution because all acts outside the constitution are without authority. Being without authority it is as if they never were. When congress took over the lawful governments during the Civil War and expanded its “dependent state” and overtook the “independent state” making the “independent state” a “dependent state” it did so without authority, without authority it is outside of the constitution, being outside the constitution the act is “void” not “voidable” in any court. It is as if it never were, therefore the “legal state” instituted by the Lincoln Administration, is as if it never were. The Articles of Confederation acknowledged that the States of “The United States of America” are “free, sovereign and independent” they are “independent states” independent states are “sovereign” being “sovereign” they are “free.” In the constitution these “independent states” are called “particular states” they gave lands to the federal government for “defenCe” purposes, not “defenSe.” The constitution allowed for the creation of the “dependent states” the “dependent states” are placed upon the annexed lands, the annexed lands are used for federal purposes, federal purposes are for “defenCe” not “defenSe.” The dependent states are the states in the constitution, they are non-sovereign states, they have no sovereignty, they are not free. They cannot cede from the union, they cannot become independent states, they cannot enter into alliances, treaties, etc. They are called “several states” they are placed upon “the lands” and are under the laws of the constitution and the constitutional government. Use of Blacks Law Dictionary 9th Edition for the following definitions: “independent state” “dependent state” “federal citizen, citizen of the United States.” During the Lincoln Administration, there were arguments on the congressional floor, these arguments were over the use of the military to take over the “independent states” and make them into “dependent states” removing their sovereignty and making them into subjects of the federal government, by forcing the “independent states” to give up their status as an “independent state” by using the military to take over their state governments. Lincoln does not hide this fact, some members of congress understood what was going on and made many arguments against this illegal take over where Lincoln called the “independent state” governments “illegal” and took them over by military force and called them, “legal states” which removed their sovereignty and made them subject to the federal government. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THIS AS WELL AS VARIOUS OTHER REPORTS, BOOKS, CASES, ETC. PLEASE CONSIDER VISITING THIS PAGE: https://archive.org/details/lack-of-federal-jurisdiction-over-free-people FOR THE VARIOUS BOOKS, REPORTS, DICTIONARIES, ETC. YOU MAY CHECK THESE: BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 9TH EDITION: KEY TERMS: DEPENDENT STATE INDEPENDENT STATE FEDERAL CITIZEN https://archive.org/details/2009-blacks-law-dictionary-edition-9 LAW OF NATIONS, VATTEL, CHITTY. SEE TERM “DEFENCE” AS “FORTIFICATION” https://archive.org/details/good-copy-de-vattel-the-law-of-nations UPSHUR, STATEMENT THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT UNDER FEDERAL CONTROL: https://archive.org/details/upshur-33 GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) INVENTORY REPORT ON JURISDICTIONAL STATUS OF FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES. SEE PAGE ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION AND THE FORM FOR JURISDICTIONAL CODES: https://archive.org/details/inventory-report-on-jurisdictional-status-of-federal-areas-within-the-states.-fe JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES, PART 1.: https://archive.org/details/jurisdiction-over-federal-areas-within-the-states-part-1_202105 JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES, PART 2.: http s://archive.org/details/jurisdiction-over-federal-areas-within-the-state-part-2_202105

View Less

LACK OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION OVER FREE PEOPLE : JENN WEST : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive archive.org

August 3, 2021

Recent Photos

View More Photos