photo #9458837

“IF YOU CAN AFFORD A $1,200 PHONE, YOU DON’T NEED FOOD STAMPS!” — LOCAL GROCERY OWNER SPARKS OUTRAGE OVER CONTROVERSIAL NEW POLICYBy Martha Wilkins | Possum Creek Times ReporterPOSSUM CREEK, OHIO — A local grocery store owner is facing fierce criticism after announcing a controversial new policy targeting customers who receive government food assistance while carrying expensive smartphones, wearing designer clothing, or purchasing what he considers luxury items.Harold Benson, 58, owner of Benson’s Family Market, says he’s tired of watching customers use Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to purchase groceries while carrying phones that cost more than some people’s monthly mortgage payments.“I’m standing there watching somebody buy $200 worth of groceries with food stamps while holding a $1,200 iPhone. Meanwhile, I’ve got elderly customers counting pennies to buy a loaf of bread. Somebody explain to me how that makes sense.”Benson announced that his store would begin refusing SNAP transactions from customers he believes are displaying obvious signs of unnecessary luxury spending.His proposed policy includes customers carrying high-end smartphones, wearing expensive designer clothing, or possessing luxury handbags.“I’m not against helping people who need help. I’m against people taking advantage of a system that’s supposed to help people who genuinely can’t afford to eat.”But the announcement quickly drew criticism from residents who say Benson has no business judging someone’s financial circumstances based on their appearance.Local mother of three Melissa Carter, 34, says she receives SNAP benefits while working full-time and owns an iPhone she purchased three years ago before losing her higher-paying job.“He sees a phone. He doesn’t see the 45 hours I work every week. He doesn’t see my rent, my electric bill, or what it costs to raise three children. Apparently, I’m supposed to sell everything I own before I’m allowed to buy groceries.”Benson remains unapologetic.“If somebody pulls up in a $70,000 vehicle, walks in wearing $300 shoes, and expects taxpayers to buy their groceries, I’m going to have questions.”The controversy has also raised concerns about whether the proposed policy could violate federal SNAP regulations.Retailers authorized to accept SNAP generally cannot create their own eligibility requirements based on customers’ possessions or clothing. Benson’s proposal could therefore jeopardize his store’s authorization to participate in the program.When asked about that possibility, Benson replied:“So the government can decide who qualifies for assistance, but I’m not allowed to question anything? That’s exactly the problem.”Not everyone disagrees with him.Retired factory worker Leonard Hayes, 67, says he supports Benson’s position.“I worked 42 years. I paid taxes every one of them. There’s nothing wrong with helping people who are struggling, but there ought to be some accountability.”Others say the policy would unfairly punish families who are already struggling.“Having a nice phone doesn’t mean you have money,” said local resident Ashley Monroe, 29. “People lose jobs. People get divorced. People fall on hard times. You don’t know somebody’s bank account by looking at their shoes.”Despite mounting criticism, Benson says he has no plans to apologize, although he acknowledges that he may have to reconsider how the policy is implemented.“People can call me whatever they want. But somebody needs to start asking where the line is between helping people and enabling them.”For now, the controversy has divided residents, with some calling for a boycott of Benson’s Family Market and others promising to shop there specifically because of the owner’s stance.WHAT DO YOU THINK, POSSUM CREEK?Should someone receiving taxpayer-funded food assistance be questioned for owning expensive phones, vehicles, or designer clothing?Or is it nobody’s business what a person owns as long as they legally qualify for assistance?IS THIS STORE OWNER STANDING UP FOR TAXPAYERS, OR HAS HE GONE TOO FAR?#localbusiness #smalltownliving #foodstamps #grocerystore