photo #9449293

Two former NBA players say they identify as women and want to play in the WNBA.It sounds like the setup to a bad joke. Somehow it ended up in front of Congress.In August, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced they identify as women and plan to enter the 2027 WNBA Draft. The league's contract with its players has exactly one line on this: only players who are women are eligible.No definition. No mention of biology.So Republican lawmakers asked the obvious question. How does the WNBA define a woman?For more than two months, the league never issued a formal ruling. Its only answer came through anonymous sources.Then, in an October 16 letter, Commissioner Cathy Engelbert finally put it in writing. Only women can play, she said, and Freedom and White are "both men."Credit where it's due. She got the answer right.But look at what she still wouldn't do. Congress asked for a definition. She never gave one.So the league is certain these two are men, but it can't tell you what a woman is.Read that again.Freedom caught it right away. If you won't define the word, how are you deciding who fits it? He has said the whole point of his campaign is to force the league to write "biological female" into the rules.He's right. Yet instead of demanding the definition Congress asked for, Rep. Marlin Stutzman, one of the lawmakers behind the inquiry, welcomed the letter as a "first step."A first step? This isn't complicated.A woman is an adult human female. Biology decides it, not a feeling and not a press release. The WNBA is a women's league, so it should be open to biological women. Period.One sentence would end this entire circus. She could have written it in the same letter.She didn't. And the longer the league refuses, the more obvious it becomes that the vagueness is the point.