photo #9370319

Constance Margaret Fisher was an American serial mass murderer. Diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, she killed three of her children in Maine in 1954, and after spending several years in a mental institution, she was released, only to kill three more of her children in 1966.On March 8, 1954, Carl returned home from work to find that the door had been locked.Worried that something was off, he contacted Dr. Richard Chasse, the physician who had been treating his wife for recent bouts of depression, and the men broke down the door. Carl then went inside and went to the bedroom, where he saw the corpses of Daniel and Deborah tucked in their beds, at first appearing to be asleep. He then stepped into the bathroom, where he found that his eldest son Richard had been drowned in the bathtub.[2]Panicked and unable to find his wife, he quickly contacted the authorities, who rushed to the crime scene.A search of the house led to the officers finding Constance hidden under a bed, having been rendered unconscious from a suicide attempt by drinking a bottle of liquid shampoo. A suicide note written by her was located, with Constance explaining that she had drowned the children to "save them from evil" and that God had ordered her to do so.Internment and releaseeditSoon after she was found, Constance was arrested and charged with murder. The killings came as a shock to the community, who struggled to believe that she was capable of doing such a thing. Before she was able to stand trial, a forensic psychiatric examination concluded that she was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and was thus considered unable to stand trial.[1]Because of this, Constance was interned at the Augusta State Hospital in Augusta for treatment.While hospitalized there, she calmly explained that she had drowned the children one by one and she had done it because, as she claimed to one psychiatrist, "I wanted someone to baby me." In order to cure her, Fisher was given insulin injections and high doses of hormones, which would sometimes cause her to experience seizures.Within a year of her internment, she started to show signs of improvement, no longer hearing voices or experiencing any auditory hallucinations.In 1955, her husband initiated a legal process to have her released, but his requests were denied by the hospital's medical board. After four years, partly due to a national effort to deinstitutionalize mental patients, Constance was released to her husband's custody on March 6, 1959.[3]‼️The couple soon moved to a new home Carl had built for the family in Fairfield, where they would have three more children: Kathleen Louise (b. 1960), Michael Jon (b. 1962) and Natalie Rose (b. 1965).[1]Second incidentOn June 30, 1966, Carl returned home from work, only to find 9-month-old Natalie drowned in the bathtub.Shocked by the discovery, he ran towards the home of neighbor Howard Wood to use his telephone, as his home did not have one. Police were called to the scene, and after examining the crime scene, officers found the bodies of Michael and Kathleen tucked in their beds.Constance herself was also found lying in her bed, having been rendered unconscious from a suicide attempt to overdose on pills. Newspapers at the time noted the eerie similarities with the previous murders, calling it a "duplication of tragedy".Constance was rushed to the Thayer Hospital in Waterville, where she was nursed until she regained consciousness.[5] Local authorities sought to charge her with murder, and after she was discharged, Constance was brought to Skowhegan in Somerset County for deliberations between prosecutors, before a decision was made for her to be tried in Kennebec County.-----The 1954 case of Constance Fisher stands as a grim historical precedent. After drowning her three children in a bathtub, she was sent to a psychiatric facility, deemed rehabilitated, and released. Her husband welcomed her back, they had three more children, and she drowned those three as well, in the same tub, using the same justification. Six children lost their lives because a legal and medical framework treated an absolute act of violence as a condition with an expiration date.The public discourse surrounding modern tragedies such as Lindsay Clancy strangling her children often swings immediately toward sympathy for the perpetrator, wringing hands over the harshness of a prison cell. Yet true cruelty is found in the image of three lifeless children. It is the systemic failure of offering a path back to society after such an act, running an already-proven experiment with the lives of the vulnerable.While severe psychological distress may clarify how a person reaches such a breaking point, it cannot function as an absolution or a free pass for murder. It certainly does not grant anyone the right to custody of future children, nor does it demand that society gamble on a repeat offense.When someone takes the lives of their own children, the right to motherhood is permanently forfeited. There should be no soft landings, no rehabilitation pathways, and no second families. Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole is the only appropriate response to prevent further tragedies born from misplaced leniency.