photo #9271508

So I’m sitting there the other morning, minding my own business and trying to figure out why my coffee never tastes as good as the stuff they show in the commercials, when I see that Mike Lindell’s Election Crime Bureau has dropped what they’re calling historic evidence against the voting machines.Not a tweet. Not a strongly worded letter. An actual report — “The 2020 Election – An Attack Upon U.S. Critical Infrastructure” — with 824 findings and 2,517 citations pulled from court records, government documents, sworn testimony, and technical forensics. They’re treating the election like it was critical infrastructure, the same category as the power grid or the water supply. And they’re saying that once you look at what actually happened to the records and the machines, the whole thing became functionally unauditable.For years the official position has been “there is no evidence.” Which is a fascinating claim when you consider that Patrick Colbeck and the team at the Election Crime Bureau just handed over a document that basically says, “Here. We numbered everything. Go check the footnotes yourself.” Colbeck’s quote is basically: don’t trust us, read the citations, make up your own mind. That’s the most reasonable thing I’ve heard anyone say about this subject since 2020.Some of the machine stuff is the part that really makes you stare at the screen. Voting systems running outside their certified configurations. Uncertified software updates getting pushed through anyway. Error rates that would get you fired from any other job involving counting. Weak passwords and shared logins, because apparently “security” was treated like a suggestion rather than a requirement. Plaintext encryption keys stored right next to the actual votes, which seems… convenient. And logs that auto-overwrite themselves so you can’t go back and see what happened.They apparently knew about 319 classified-level vulnerabilities and managed to keep that information quiet for 22 months. The report points out the obvious: those same machines are still certified. They’re still going to be used in 2026. The question isn’t whether they were vulnerable in 2020. The question is whether anybody actually fixed anything or if we’re all just supposed to pretend the problems were imaginary.Then there’s the record-keeping, or lack of it. Federal law says you’re supposed to preserve ballot images, adjudication logs, memory cards, tally tapes, and surveillance video for 22 months. In enough places those things went missing or got destroyed. In Michigan they apparently counted 499,850 more ballots than there were voters. Pennsylvania had 155,053 extra. Fulton County had 22,534 more ballots than voters. Each of those numbers was bigger than the final margin in those states. But again, nothing to see here. Move along.And while we’re at it, some of these systems had Chinese components, data centers running on Huawei gear, code being maintained in Serbia, and poll-worker files sitting on a server in Beijing. The CIA apparently looked at the Chinese angle and decided, for reasons that were surely very serious and not at all political, that it wasn’t worth making a fuss about.Mike Lindell has been out there saying this stuff for years while a lot of other Republicans were busy explaining why it was time to “move on” and “heal the country.” Good for him for actually putting the receipts in one place instead of just complaining on television. The whole report is sitting at buff.ly/AcyUx8N if you want to go look at it. Download it, read the citations, see what you think.Or don’t. But if you’re still walking around repeating “there was no evidence,” you might want to ask yourself why the people in charge spent six years telling you that instead of just showing you the evidence in the first place. Because according to this thing, the evidence wasn’t missing. It was just inconvenient. Or worse.