photo #9245078

The claim you shared mixes some verified facts with several conclusions that are disputed or not established.Here’s a more evidence-based summary:Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard did release declassified information stating that the U.S. funded or supported more than 120 biological laboratories in over 30 countries and criticized government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, for allegedly misleading the public about those programs.The released materials describe many of the facilities as part of biosecurity and disease-surveillance programs, including the Pentagon's Cooperative Threat Reduction effort, which was originally designed to reduce biological threats and secure dangerous pathogens.The existence of U.S.-funded biological research laboratories is not, by itself, evidence of biological weapons development. Multiple experts and officials have argued that these facilities conduct public-health, pathogen-monitoring, and biosecurity work rather than weapons programs.Regarding COVID-19's origin, there is still no definitive public consensus. Some U.S. agencies have assessed that a laboratory-related origin is possible, while others have favored natural emergence or stated that the evidence remains inconclusive.Claims that Fauci's actions caused "millions of deaths," that he committed crimes, or that he knowingly covered up evidence are allegations, not established legal findings. No court has convicted him of such offenses. Current public debates involve competing interpretations of pandemic policy, scientific decisions, and government transparency rather than proven criminal conclusions.Fact: The newly released intelligence documents have reignited debate about gain-of-function research, biosafety oversight, and transparency surrounding overseas biological research programs.Source: Official Office of the Director of National Intelligence releases, reporting on the declassified documents, and coverage of the ongoing debate over overseas biolabs and pandemic origins.Disclaimer: Many aspects of this topic remain politically and scientifically contested. It is important to distinguish between documented facts, intelligence assessments, expert opinions, and allegations that have not been proven in court or established by a consensus of evidence.