photo #5940474

Big fuss over the pork slogan in front of a restaurant in Bad Ischl (a spa town in Austria) Excitement in Bad Ischl! The trigger is a host known for his funny sayings. His text about people who eat pork is explosive. And in the eyes of some, it went too far, given the already tense political climate. Others agree with the restaurant owner. A sign outside his restaurant reads: “People who eat pork are statistically less likely to blow themselves and others up.” A provocation that is of course primarily aimed at Muslims. There is already a lot of excitement online, where pictures of the saying are spreading rapidly. Some feel “deeply disappointed and attacked”, others see “pure racism”. [Islam is an ideology and not a race, MORON.] In a free newspaper, a reader said that reading this text took his breath away, and called for “messages of peace;” after all, the situation was already very tense. (Appeasing Islam has worked so well for us during the last 1,400+ years, hasn’t it? Are people really that willfully blind and ignorant of what Islam and its followers stand for?) Lots of approval online However, the opinions are not as clearly distributed as the rapporteurs want to convey. If you look at the comment columns, it is quite clear that the innkeeper also receives a lot of support. “It’s a bit harsh, but unfortunately he’s right,” says one user on Facebook. “Sometimes the truth hurts,” writes another. “He’s absolutely right,” many people say. He writes on his bar’s Facebook page: “I took a quote from the internet and publicly wrote it on the board in front of our bar. Although this is satire, unfortunately, this statement can be seen as hostile towards religions, which I later realized. I hereby publicly apologize!” There is no reason to “live Islamophobia.” “It was never my intention to slander or offend anyone.” He ‘clearly distances himself from this’ and asks for forgiveness for the mistake No matter what all those apologists for the “Culture Enrichers” are saying, this restaurant owner is 100% spot-on in his assessment of the “religion of piece(s).”