Now is the time to get as prepared as you can if you have animals who are sensitive to fireworks.
- Walk them before the fireworks begin, so they are inside the house and secure.
- Be sure they hav... View MoreNow is the time to get as prepared as you can if you have animals who are sensitive to fireworks.
- Walk them before the fireworks begin, so they are inside the house and secure.
- Be sure they have proper ID and the contact information on them is correct.
- Try using white noise when the fireworks begin. Turn on fans, air conditioner, turn the volume up on radio or TV, etc. There's some classical music called "Through A Dog's Ear" that some people claim has calming effects for dogs.
- Try creating a safe haven for them. Dogs are den animals....they're looking for a "cave" to escape from the noise.
- If their anxiety is severe, a vet appointment might be your best bet to discuss a medication that would help soothe your pet's anxiety caused by fireworks, thunder and the like.
- For dogs kept outside who are fearful of fireworks, obviously the best and kindest thing to do is bring them inside until the fireworks are over.
- Farm animals could also suffer from anxiety caused by fireworks. Might be a good idea to secure them safely in their barn.
Keep in mind, July 4 is the night most animals go missing. More than any other day of the year. Please take the necessary steps to keep your pets safe. Make sure they have on collars with tags that have the correct contact info. If chipped, make sure the chip has the correct contact info. Everyone might not like fireworks, but everyone certainly can still have a safe holiday, including our pets.
-Ella Logan
Have a good new week everyone!
Untitled
190 views
I was filming this pretty breeze and thinking about this quote. One day, eventually most of this will likely be developed in some way. I keep seeing land being plowed over at a rapid pace. Our beautiful open spaces and eco systems are being used up and it's sad to me.
Life in 2030: The Rise of the Permission Society
Most people will not wake up one morning and find that the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, or any other global institution has taken over th... View MoreLife in 2030: The Rise of the Permission Society
Most people will not wake up one morning and find that the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, or any other global institution has taken over their country. That is not how this kind of change happens.
It happens slowly. It happens through policies, banking rules, school programs, health systems, energy regulations, online safety laws, climate targets, digital identity programs, artificial intelligence, and public-private partnerships. It happens through governments, corporations, banks, insurance companies, technology platforms, universities, hospitals, and utilities all moving in the same general direction.
To the average person, it will not look like a dramatic revolution. It will look like a new app. A new login. A new verification step. A new fee. A new rule. A new restriction. A new reason why something that used to be simple now requires approval.
That is the real concern.
The future being built is not sold as control. It is sold as safety, convenience, efficiency, sustainability, inclusion, resilience, and modernization. Those words sound harmless. Some of the ideas even sound useful. But when these systems are joined together, they create a world where ordinary people have less independence and fewer ways to live outside official channels.
Energy is one of the clearest examples. In the future being planned, electricity will not simply be something people use when they need it. It will be managed, priced, monitored, and rationed by smart systems. Smart meters, AI-managed grids, electric vehicle charging schedules, demand-response programs, and peak-hour pricing will decide when energy is cheap, expensive, discouraged, or possibly restricted.
The average household will be told to conserve. People will be encouraged to use less power, shift their usage, buy approved appliances, drive approved vehicles, and live in more “efficient” ways. At the same time, data centers, AI systems, military networks, cloud platforms, automated warehouses, and large corporations will need massive amounts of electricity. Those systems will be treated as essential. The ordinary person will be told to reduce his footprint while the machine economy expands around him.
Food will also become more controlled. Grocery stores will still exist. Restaurants will still exist. Food delivery apps will still exist. But behind the scenes, farming, fertilizer, water use, land use, animal agriculture, packaging, emissions, nutrition policy, and supply chains will be more heavily regulated and tracked.
Meat and dairy may not disappear, but they will likely become more expensive and more politically targeted. Alternative proteins, lab-assisted foods, synthetic ingredients, heavily processed substitutes, and AI-managed agriculture will be promoted as sustainable and necessary. Small farmers will face more paperwork, more restrictions, and higher compliance costs. Large food corporations and agricultural technology companies will gain more control over the food system.
The public will be told this is about saving the planet and improving health. In real life, it could mean fewer food choices, higher prices, more processed diets, and less local independence.
Digital ID is another major piece of this future. At first, it will be presented as convenient. One ID for government services. One ID for banking. One ID for healthcare. One ID for travel. One ID for school records, benefits, taxes, online accounts, and age verification.
The problem is not simply having a digital ID. The problem is what happens when that ID becomes the key to normal life.
If a person needs verified digital identity to access his bank, medical records, government benefits, internet services, employment platforms, travel systems, and payment apps, then losing access becomes serious. A failed verification, a frozen account, a security flag, a wrong database entry, or a policy violation could block a person from services he needs to function.
In the old world, a person could often walk into an office, show paper documents, pay cash, speak to a human being, and solve the problem. In the new world, he may be stuck behind a screen, waiting for an automated system to approve him.
Currency will move in the same direction. Physical cash will probably not vanish overnight, especially in the United States. But it will become less common, less convenient, and less accepted. More transactions will move through digital wallets, bank apps, payment processors, instant-payment networks, stablecoins, tokenized systems, or eventually central bank digital currency.
The average person may still think he is just paying with a card or phone. But every digital payment creates a record. Every transaction can be tracked, analyzed, flagged, reversed, taxed, restricted, or denied. That does not mean every transaction will be controlled every day. It means the technical ability to control transactions will be built into the system.
That matters.
A cash-based society allows a certain amount of privacy and independence. A fully digital payment society does not. Once money becomes mostly digital, access to money becomes permission-based. Banks, governments, platforms, and payment companies become gatekeepers.
Technology itself will become less like a tool and more like an environment people are forced to live inside. Phones, cars, appliances, homes, cameras, wearables, payment apps, school platforms, work software, and health portals will constantly collect data. The average person will be surrounded by systems that identify him, track him, recommend choices, limit choices, score behavior, and automate decisions.
This will not always feel oppressive. In many cases, it will feel convenient. The door unlocks automatically. The payment goes through instantly. The car updates itself. The doctor receives the data. The school platform tracks the assignment. The government portal stores the form.
But convenience has a price. The more life depends on these systems, the harder it becomes to live without them.
Artificial intelligence will sit behind much of it. AI will screen job applications, monitor workers, grade students, write reports, detect fraud, analyze health records, moderate speech, route police attention, set prices, manage logistics, and answer customer complaints.
For the average worker, this means permanent pressure. He will be told to reskill, adapt, learn AI tools, accept automation, and compete with machines. Some people will benefit. Many will not. Office workers, clerks, customer service employees, translators, writers, designers, junior programmers, paralegals, analysts, dispatchers, drivers, warehouse workers, and even teachers will face constant automation pressure.
The machine does not need to replace every worker to damage the labor market. It only needs to replace enough people to lower wages, weaken bargaining power, and make human labor seem expensive, slow, or inconvenient.
The cost of living will likely remain high. The public is told that smart systems and green transitions will make life more efficient. But building those systems is expensive. Data centers, AI infrastructure, new power grids, electric vehicle networks, cybersecurity systems, digital ID platforms, health data networks, automated logistics, and climate compliance programs all cost money.
Those costs do not disappear. They show up as higher taxes, utility bills, rents, insurance premiums, service fees, subscription costs, product prices, and public debt.
The average person will not just pay for food, housing, transportation, and healthcare. He will pay for access. Access to software. Access to digital identity. Access to banking. Access to platforms. Access to education. Access to cloud services. Access to transportation networks. Access to monitored insurance plans. Access to the modern economy itself.
Ownership will slowly give way to subscription. People will own less and rent more. They will pay monthly for cars, software, entertainment, security, data storage, tools, education, and even features inside products they already bought.
Prices will also become more dynamic. That means prices will change constantly based on time, location, demand, personal data, risk profile, loyalty status, and what the system thinks a person is willing to pay.
People already see this with airline tickets, hotels, rideshare apps, and online shopping. The same logic can spread into electricity, insurance, road use, vehicle charging, groceries, healthcare, education, and digital services.
The public explanation will be efficiency. The real experience will be that prices feel unstable, opaque, and unfair.
Education will become more digital and more workforce-driven. Children will use AI tutors, digital dashboards, automated grading systems, online assignments, surveillance software, and digital credentials. Schools will talk more about future skills, climate literacy, digital citizenship, online safety, and preparing students for an AI economy.
Some of this may help students learn. But it also risks turning education into screen-based training for a managed society. Instead of forming independent adults, schools may increasingly produce compliant digital workers who know how to operate inside platforms, follow prompts, accept monitoring, and adapt to systems they did not choose.
Politics will still exist, but it will become more managerial. People will still vote. Parties will still argue. Campaigns will still happen. But many important decisions will be moved into expert agencies, international agreements, public-private partnerships, platform rules, banking compliance, climate targets, AI safety boards, and emergency frameworks.
The average voter will be allowed to choose between political personalities, but many of the core policies will keep moving in the same direction no matter who is elected. The language will be technical. The choices will be framed as necessary. The public will be told these issues are too complex, too global, or too urgent for ordinary democratic debate.
Buying and selling will also become more permission-based. A small business owner will need digital payments, verified identity, tax integration, platform access, cybersecurity compliance, banking approval, insurance approval, and possibly environmental reporting. A customer will need a verified account, approved payment method, delivery profile, and acceptable risk score.
Informal economic life will become harder. Cash jobs, private sales, local repair work, small food sales, independent marketplaces, and person-to-person trade may not be banned outright. But they will be pushed to the edges. Banks may view them as risky. Platforms may block them. Regulators may burden them. Insurance companies may refuse them.
The result is simple: more economic activity will be forced through approved digital channels.
Internet access will remain available, but it will be more controlled. People will still post, search, watch videos, read news, and use social media. But what they see and say will be shaped by identity checks, age verification, content moderation, algorithmic filtering, demonetization, fact-checking labels, misinformation policies, online safety laws, and platform liability rules.
Some of this will target real harm: scams, fraud, child exploitation, threats, and criminal networks. But the same tools can also be used against lawful dissent. A person questioning government policy, medical policy, war policy, climate policy, migration policy, banking policy, or election policy could be labeled dangerous, misleading, hateful, extremist, or harmful.
Censorship in this kind of world does not always look like a banned book or a police raid. It looks like a post that nobody sees. A channel that cannot earn money. An account that needs review. A search result buried ten pages down. A payment processor that cancels service. A platform that says the user violated community standards but refuses to explain clearly how.
Healthcare will become more digital, predictive, and automated. Patients will use portals, telemedicine, wearable devices, digital prescriptions, AI triage, electronic health records, and remote monitoring. This may improve some care, especially for routine issues. But it also creates a more impersonal system.
The average patient may have to go through apps, insurance algorithms, automated triage, risk scoring, treatment pathways, and compliance checks before seeing a real doctor. Health data from wearables, prescriptions, vaccine records, genetic tests, lifestyle habits, and medical history could influence insurance, employment, travel, or access to services.
The official promise is better care. The danger is that healthcare becomes another control system where people are rewarded for compliance and punished for refusal, delay, skepticism, or inability to use the technology.
The social result would be a world that talks constantly about inclusion while creating new forms of exclusion. Nobody has to openly say, “This person is cut off from society.” The system can simply deny access.
The payment fails. The account is under review. The identity cannot be verified. The post is limited. The insurance rate increases. The bank closes the account. The application is rejected. The appeal goes to a chatbot. The customer service number never reaches a human being.
That is how modern exclusion works. It does not always look like force. It looks like friction.
The people most likely to benefit from this future are large technology companies, banks, defense contractors, cloud providers, data-center operators, energy companies, insurance firms, pharmaceutical networks, global consultancies, major universities, large NGOs, and governments that want more visibility and control.
The people most likely to be harmed are the poor, elderly, rural, disabled, technically unskilled, politically dissident, cash-dependent, self-employed, unbanked, and anyone who values privacy and independence.
The middle class will not disappear all at once. It will be squeezed. Housing will cost more. Energy will cost more. Insurance will cost more. Food will cost more. Transportation will cost more. Education will cost more. Healthcare will cost more. Subscriptions will multiply. Jobs will become less secure. Human service will become harder to reach.
At the same time, people will be told that life is more advanced, more sustainable, more inclusive, and more efficient.
That is the contradiction.
The world may look cleaner, smarter, and more connected. But beneath the surface, the average person may have less control over his own life. He may have more technology, but less freedom. More convenience, but less privacy. More safety language, but fewer real choices. More services, but more conditions attached to those services.
The danger is not that every part of this future is fake or useless. Some parts will work. Some will be convenient. Some will solve real problems.
That is exactly why it is dangerous.
A system does not need to be completely evil to become oppressive. It only needs to make daily life dependent on permission. Once energy, food, money, identity, speech, healthcare, education, work, and commerce are all tied into monitored digital systems, the average person no longer lives as a free citizen in the old sense.
He lives as an approved user.
And approved users can be downgraded, restricted, suspended, corrected, or removed.
bantamjoe.substack.com/p/life-in-2030-the-rise-of-the-permission
page=2&profile_user_id=95792&year=&month=
Load More
