Drag to reposition your photo

Harsha Sankar

Male.

Joined Groups1

5000 Members

The Patriot Party

Politics and Elections

Liked Pages2

1632 Likes

The Resistance

Politics

864 Likes

Judicial Watch with Tom Fitton

Company, Organization, or Institution » Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)

Harsha Sankar

Report this User

Status Update

Harsha Sankar

December 23, 2020 4:42 am

It appears that the Presidential election results may be significantly changed before January 6th. The Senate Judiciary Committee of Georgia has stated that the Presidential election in its state was... View MoreIt appears that the Presidential election results may be significantly changed before January 6th. The Senate Judiciary Committee of Georgia has stated that the Presidential election in its state was indeed lawfully defective and that a special session of the General Assembly should be called to decertify its election results. This measure will now have the judiciary committee of Georgia's lower house to evaluate the election. If they rule the same as the Senate judiciary committee, a special session would be called and in all probability, this Presidential election would be decertified. In Arizona, its senate judiciary committee is reviewing the Dominion voting machines in its largest county, Maricopa. If they feel those machines did not adequately yield accurate results, they will send the resolution to its lower house. If both houses feel a special session of its general assembly is needed to vote on the decertification of its election, then that is what will happen. In Wisconsin, their Supreme Court opined that clerks did not have unilateral lawful authority to issue "Indefinite Confinement" status to the voters. Therefore any ballots sent by voters who received such status from only the clerks should not be deemed as lawful. Those ballots should be rejected. However, this is something both its houses has to decide. Both houses would call for a special election if both felt that decertification was in order. Both houses would follow the same process if they feel that the 221,000 mail-in ballots ,which did not meet written request requirements, were indeed unlawful. Those three states could see their state legislatures choose Trump electors as its electors. After all, if they believe that their prescribed manner in selecting electors was not proper, they can choose the electors directly. Of course, if it is not clear to them as to what candidate won the presidential election in its state, then that state should choose to not have any electoral vote representation. As President trump has already stated, the certification of an election as lawful when it is indeed not, is by itself unlawful. Hopefully these three states would have its legislatures take a decision before the New Year.

View Less