There is no such thing as "radical" Islam, or Islamism, or extremist Islam; there is only Islam. That means there's no difference between the guy who blows himself up, and the guy who just attends Mo... View MoreThere is no such thing as "radical" Islam, or Islamism, or extremist Islam; there is only Islam. That means there's no difference between the guy who blows himself up, and the guy who just attends Mosque and has said the Shahada.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RTJOf6OLdw
Piers Morgan
Before I go to Jonathan for that answer, just to clarify for viewers, what do you perceive, Muhammad, to be the difference between Islam and Islamism? Because people hear these phrases, they hear these words. A lot of people get confused.
What is the difference?
Mohammed Hijab
Well, the difference from a political science perspective, right, is that Islamism is an attempt to politicize Islam. That's usually the definition that political scientists use.
However, I mean that the fact is this. Islam has always been a political system. So,
we don't know exactly where that starts and where that ends because this construct, Islamism, I would say, is a social construct and it's a euroentric view. We don't have this distinction. We've never had it in our texts. We've never had it in our
medieval manuals. So the fact is this is a western construct in political science that's used to try and distinguish between Muslims who are attempting political participation in some way, violent or nonviolent, versus Muslims who are not doing it.
'He's a TERRORIST!' Mohammed Hijab vs Jonathan Conricus | Migrant Protests, Iran War, Israel & Islam
From the Port of Dover to the streets of Southern England, the UK is reaching a breaking point. As protests over small boat arrivals escalate into a broader cultural flashpoint, the familiar chants of
Every time the US military goes against Muslim forces, we kick your rear end until we decide we're tired of it, and we leave. That's the only way you could ever win inside the US, is if Americans deci... View MoreEvery time the US military goes against Muslim forces, we kick your rear end until we decide we're tired of it, and we leave. That's the only way you could ever win inside the US, is if Americans decide to let you win. Otherwise, the results will be the same as on the battlefields--you will lose.
And, some of us intend to designate Islam as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, bulldoze your Mosques, strip you of your citizenship, and deport you en masse.
Abdurrahman Ahmad Bello
18h
·
Muslims will no longer tolerate Islamophobia in the UK, the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, or anywhere else.
We are done with the tired excuse that “this is a Christian country” and therefore Muslims should leave.
No. It isn't your private religious property.
A Muslim born in Britain is British. A Muslim born in America is American. A Muslim born in Canada is Canadian. A Muslim born in Australia is Australian. The same is true across Europe.
And this isn't even about immigration. There are Muslims whose families have lived in these countries for generations. Some were born into Muslim families; others' parents or ancestors embraced Islam. Their faith does not erase their nationality, ancestry, citizenship, or right to belong.
Religion is not a passport.
You don't become more British because you're Christian, and you don't become less British because you're Muslim.
Christianity may have played an enormous role in the history and culture of Western countries. Fine. History is history. But historical influence does not give one religion ownership of an entire nation or the authority to decide who belongs.
No religion owns a country.
And don't tell Muslims to “go back to where they came from” simply because they are Muslim. What if the country you're telling them to leave is the country they were born in? What if their parents were born there? What if their grandparents are buried there? What if this is their father's land too?
You are free to criticize Islam. You are free to debate Muslims. You are free to argue about immigration, integration, secularism, and government policy.
But you do not get to turn your religious prejudice into a claim that an entire population has no right to belong.
Muslims are not guests waiting for permission to exist.
We belong wherever we are citizens, wherever our families have built their lives, and wherever our communities call home.
So before you tell a Muslim to “go back to their country,” answer one question:
Which country exactly?
I cannot believe the absolute brain rot that is epidemic among Americans, particularly conservative, Christian
Americans who should know better.
It really makes me wonder if our country will be arou... View MoreI cannot believe the absolute brain rot that is epidemic among Americans, particularly conservative, Christian
Americans who should know better.
It really makes me wonder if our country will be around in 50 years.
And then there’s the severe lack of participation by people whose future depends on their participation.
Are y’all content to watch your kids be bent over by a bunch of communists, perverts, and Islamics?
That’s what’s coming, but you are doing nothing.
Some of the most grievous recent stupidity is related to Charlie Kirk.
Here’s a rebuttal to the latest moronicity from the Candace crowd:
https://www.kanekoa.news/p/no-charlie-kirk-was-not-killed-by?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-da46e3eb-29e6-4d40-be91-678d8a89440b
No, Charlie Kirk Was Not Killed by an Israeli Gun Drone Launched From a U.S. Army Spy Plane — Bret Weinstein, Jimmy Dore, and John Cullen Are Wrong
I pulled 1.4 million flight records, the aircraft's FAA file, and the Provo Tower tapes. No ISR equipment. No drone launch capability. And the same low pass flown 396 times at 103 airports.
107 million illegal aliens in this country. That’s 25% of the population according to Greg Bovino in an interview with Tucker Carlson.
Hey Trump, what happened to the largest deportation in history?
... View More107 million illegal aliens in this country. That’s 25% of the population according to Greg Bovino in an interview with Tucker Carlson.
Hey Trump, what happened to the largest deportation in history?
You ran into a little resistance in Minnesota and you quit? If you don’t deal with everything now, no matter how much bloodshed is involved, there will be a whole lot more bloodshed later when the left takes over again. And they will, because you and the utterly useless Republicans have done nothing.
Tucker has an agenda, for sure, and it’s not good.
But, 107 million is actually news to me. I thought 30 million was high. Guess I way underestimated.
Also, you’re not fixing election fraud. The left is going to keep stealing elections, and the first person they’ll come after is you, once they have power; and I really don’t think they’ll ever give it back again. Of course, I thought that the last time with the Biden junta, but I was wrong. But, don’t press your luck. Wait till they stack the Supreme Court, etc.
Also, why is the Iran war still happening? The Iranians are completely playing you. You cannot negotiate with Jihadis. You either kill them, or bludgeon them into submission.
Economic d-day is as stupid as negotiations. It will never work.
Every time they shoot at a ship, you should blow up a bridge or an oil refinery, and if they are back to riding camels, then it will take that much longer to rebuild their nukes.
And, as for killing them all, why aren’t you airdropping metric tons of small arms all over the country? Saturate the county with small arms, quit hamstringing the Israelis when they try to do something to Iran. You will never pressure the Jihadis to do anything. Why can’t you figure that out?
Keep your promises, sir. You are empowering the Tucker clown show to destroy the Republican Party and the conservative base.
The day before he was killed, Charlie Kirk expressed fear the left was going to kill him. No mention of Jews.
PBD Podcast
Valuetainment
@PBDsPodcast... View MoreThe day before he was killed, Charlie Kirk expressed fear the left was going to kill him. No mention of Jews.
PBD Podcast
Valuetainment
@PBDsPodcast
Andrew Wilson claims never-before-seen messages from Charlie Kirk reveal that he feared the left was trying to kill him shortly before his death.
"Never before seen messages from Charlie Kirk to his security team on September 9th, 2025. I'm gonna share the message with you today, which is the first time this information has ever been publicly revealed."
"On September 9th, Charlie security team wrote to him. Yes, law enforcement has been fully supportive and agreed to the security plan and posture. Tomorrow's event will be covered by both my team and the campus PD. If additional support is required, patrol units will be available. I have 11 on site."
"Charlie responded with this. Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me."
Richard Dawkins admits political freedom and science are possibly from a Christian culture. His regret about calling himself a "cultural christian" in that people assumed he had some sympathy towards... View MoreRichard Dawkins admits political freedom and science are possibly from a Christian culture. His regret about calling himself a "cultural christian" in that people assumed he had some sympathy towards the beliefs, which he never had. But, he still likes the freedom and the science produced by it. And, he considers Christianity the basis from which freedom and science grew.
This plays into the "American is a Christian nation," with an explicitly Christian basis for our laws, and people of all, or of no faith can still agree to that, as the basis for rejecting Islam as being protected by the First Amendment.
Ultimately, I think we need to deal with Islam as a subversive, seditious ideology; we should designate Islam as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (from what I know of the designation, it fits).
We should go beyond the current judicially acceptable boundaries, which allow action against explicit illegal acts, and allow action against those involved in active support of designated FTOs, and we should explicitly target Islam as having no First Amendment protection, targeting adherents of islam as being inherently subversive and seditious, whether they have engaged in explicit illegal activity or not; to reverse the judicial decisions that no natural born citizen can have their citizenship revoked, and to revoke the citizenship of all those found to have affiliated with Islam and deport them.
This worked with the American Indians. When was the last time you heard of an Indian massacre? Not since they were all packed up and sent far away.
We like to down down our long noses at our past, and say, if it had been us, we would not have done this. But, we shouldn't be so fast to engage in such disparaging of our ancestors. They acted for a reason. We can look back and examine what they did with a clearer eye, and adapt what they did that was good.
We can also look back at the various early efforts to deal with sedition, with Communist activities, etc, and decide that some of those ideas can and should be applied against Islam and Islam only, and if we have to modify some of the judicial decisions, then that's what we have to do to keep our Constitution from being overthrown, and our country from being turned into an Islamic state.
Remember, judicial decisions are not on par with the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not the judiciary.
Also remember, Islam is out to overthrow the Constitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giPkT92XfzI
Richard Dawkins regrets calling himself a “cultural Christian”
Richard Dawkins talks about his feelings towards Christianity and religion more generally.
Watch the full episode of The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie featuring Richard Dawkins:
https://youtu
page=1&profile_user_id=15354&year=&month=
Load More
