photo #9308120 » Jim's Timeline Photos » WIMKIN

DrakonOmniVore

2

2 July 24, 2026

Jim

July 24, 2026

Roger

Not quite accurate,....... No, the claims are largely inaccurate or significantly overstated. The image is from the John Birch Society (JBS) and promotes a longstanding narrative about the UN aiming to eliminate private gun ownership in the US. Here's a breakdown of the two main assertions.8e4ff4 Jb... View MoreNot quite accurate,....... No, the claims are largely inaccurate or significantly overstated. The image is from the John Birch Society (JBS) and promotes a longstanding narrative about the UN aiming to eliminate private gun ownership in the US. Here's a breakdown of the two main assertions.8e4ff4 Jbs 1. Our Global Neighborhood (1995) and “the disarming of civilians” Our Global Neighborhood is the report of the Commission on Global Governance, an independent body of about 28 individuals established in 1992. It was not an official UN body or publication, though it received endorsement from then-UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali and some funding support involving UN Development Programme trust funds, governments, and foundations.42af1b Archive The report discusses “demilitarizing international society,” reducing military spending, controlling the conventional arms trade, restricting landmines and small arms proliferation in conflict contexts, and broader ideas of global security and governance. It promotes norms around common security and limiting arms production/trade. Extensive searches do not turn up the exact quoted phrase “the disarming of civilians” as a direct call in the report (or as an official UN position). The wording appears primarily in JBS materials as a characterization or paraphrase of the report’s demilitarization themes. Critics of the report (including JBS) have long interpreted its language on arms control and global security this way, but it is not a verbatim UN demand to ban private civilian ownership in countries like the US.064118 Jbs The UN (and related bodies) has long supported efforts against illicit small arms trafficking, especially in conflict zones, and has produced reports on the impacts of civilian firearm possession in various contexts. These are not the same as a policy of banning private ownership in the United States. 2. The UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT, 2013) The ATT was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2013. It sets standards for international transfers (export, import, transit, brokering) of conventional arms, including small arms and light weapons, with the goals of reducing illicit trade, preventing diversion to terrorists/criminals/human rights abusers, and promoting transparency.1fadd1 Stimson The US signed it in 2013 under the Obama administration but the Senate never ratified it, so the US is not a full party bound by its obligations. In 2019 the Trump administration symbolically indicated it did not intend to become a party (the UN still lists the US as a signatory with a note on that communication).581020 AP News It does not require or lead to the disarming of American civilians. The treaty’s text and preamble explicitly reaffirm “the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system.” It does not create an international gun registry for private owners, mandate confiscation of legally owned firearms, or override domestic laws such as the Second Amendment. Multiple fact-checks and analyses (from sources across the spectrum) confirm it applies only to cross-border trade, not internal possession or sales.0413c3 Undispatch In short: The ATT regulates the international arms trade among states. Claims that it would “ultimately disarm Americans” misrepresent its scope and legal effect. Broader context The UN Charter (Article 2) limits the organization from intervening in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of states. Domestic gun laws in the US remain a matter of US constitutional law, statutes, and politics—not UN treaties the Senate has not ratified. UN-related discussions of small arms typically focus on conflict zones, illicit trafficking, and human rights impacts rather than a global ban on private ownership in stable democracies with strong constitutional protections. The image’s overall framing (“UN Seeks to Disarm American Citizens” / “GET US OUT OF THE UN!”) reflects a specific ideological viewpoint rather than a precise summary of the documents or treaties cited. The ATT signing/non-ratification details are factually correct as far as they go, but the claimed consequences for US civilians are not.

View Less

1

1 July 24, 2026