photo #8617463

From Chaos to Assassination: The Radical Left’s Revolutionary Blueprint to Dismantle America The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University by a suspected leftist extremist marks a chilling escalation in the radical Left’s long-standing pursuit of revolutionary change in the United States. While authorities continue to investigate the shooter’s motives, Vice President JD Vance has publicly attributed the killing to “left-wing extremism,” and Republican polls indicate widespread belief that the assassin was motivated by Democratic-aligned ideologies. This act of political violence underscores the Left’s willingness to transition from subversion and chaos to outright elimination of ideological opponents, aligning with historical patterns of revolutionary tactics that prioritize disruption over discourse. As investigations unfold, with the suspect in custody but not cooperating, this tragedy illuminates the broader methodologies employed by the radical Left to destabilize and transform American society, drawing from a rich vein of their own publications and posts that explicitly advocate for chaos as a pathway to revolution. SDS—The Issues are never the Issue; the Issue is Revolution. In my young and foolish years, I first joined the Communist Party of America in 1973, as well as the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and remained a member for approximately 10 years. I studied the works of Marx and Lenin, read Mao, read and researched all the writings of the Fabian Socialists, and those of Karl Kautsky, Karl Korsch or Daniel DeLeon, Menshevik, Trotsky and continue to research and study all branches of Socialism. I was fortunate, indeed blessed enough to read a book, quite by accident, by Ludwig von Mises, the brilliant Austrian Economist, his book Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, it was such an amazingly detailed book that I abandoned the crude economics of Socialism and have opposed it ever since. “A radical is one who advocates sweeping changes in the existing laws and methods of government. Those proposed changes are aimed at the roots of political problems which in Marxian terms are the attitudes and the behaviors of men. Radicals are not interested in ameliorating the symptoms of decay but in drastically altering the causes of societal conditions.” –Hillary Clinton One should make no mistake: the radical Left represents a revolutionary movement with ambitions that extend far beyond mere policy adjustments or shifts in priorities within the existing political framework. Its ultimate goal is the complete transformation of the national structure, seeking to establish a new regime and impose a radically different way of life. This fundamental shift targets the very foundations of American society, as the Left aims to dismantle core values, institutions, and traditions in favor of a new vision that aligns with its revolutionary ideals. The assassination of Charlie Kirk exemplifies this intent, serving as a potential “martyr-trigger” event in the mold of revolutionary agitation, where violence against prominent conservatives is rationalized as resistance to “oppression,” fueling further chaos to accelerate systemic collapse. A key strategy employed by the radical Left is its strategic alliance with the Democratic Party. This is not a mere coincidence; rather, it is a calculated move to leverage the party as a platform for advancing radical agendas. As articulated in a 2010 article in Socialist Review, “The Democratic Party is actually the best place for socialists and radicals to base themselves in order to have maximum effect in changing society.” This statement underscores the intention of radicals to operate from within the Democratic Party, using its established structures to further their revolutionary aims while cloaked in the guise of mainstream political discourse. Recent X posts from Leftist organizers echo this infiltration tactic, with one advocating for “building radical blocks” through tenant associations, cop-watching, and mutual aid networks to create “grids of power by block,” effectively embedding revolutionary cells in everyday communities. To facilitate their agenda, the radical Left often recruits individuals who may not fully grasp the ultimate objectives of the movement but are driven by a genuine desire for social change. These individuals, sometimes referred to as “useful idiots,” become instrumental in advancing the cause of radical activists. We are seeing it in the the words of Teachers, and others who have celebrated the Death of an Innocent Man. The strategy hinges on mobilizing these supporters to endorse policies and narratives that, while appearing progressive or benevolent, actually serve the deeper revolutionary goals. As noted in Socialist Review in 2007, “If you want to make a revolution you need the first; if you want to keep control of your ‘more extreme elements,’ and work within the existing framework, you build the second.” This highlights a deliberate approach: harnessing the enthusiasm of those who believe they are advocating for reform while simultaneously pushing a broader agenda of societal transformation until they see no revolutionary future in remaining peaceful. As the restrainin Radical Fabian Socialists say: "When we Strike, we Strike Hard!" Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (1971) codifies this further, instructing organizers to “shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives—agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values” to foster a climate ripe for revolution. In the context of Kirk’s assassination, such agitation could manifest as justifying violence against figures like him as a necessary “disruption” to dismantle “fascist” structures. This method of “infiltration through reform” allows radical elements to gain legitimacy and influence within the political sphere. By working to incrementally alter the structure and values of American society from within, they maintain the appearance of operating within accepted political norms. This gradual infiltration poses a significant threat to reshape society fundamentally, often without the awareness of ordinary citizens regarding the true extent of these ambitions. Additional methodologies include: Color Revolutions and Engineered Chaos: Drawing from declassified CIA tactics repurposed domestically, radicals manufacture crises to provoke overreach and justify regime change. As detailed in analyses of the Cloward-Piven strategy (1966), the goal is to “swamp the system ‘til it chokes,” overwhelming welfare and institutions to force radical reforms like guaranteed income. X posts reveal this in action, with one describing the “chaos strategy” as “manufacture the crisis, offer the solution” to expand the police state through agent provocateurs and amplified unrest. Publications like MR Online advocate augmenting worker power through struggles beyond traditional relations, aiming for systemic overthrow. Agitation and Riots: Using professional agitators to incite ethnic, student, and union groups, as per CIA guides on starting riots with just 100 operatives to mobilize 10,000. Leftist posts list methods like demonstrations, internet activism, riots, arson, vandalism, looting, and lynching as tools for confrontation. Viewpoint Magazine discusses rethinking political power for revolutionary strategy, emphasizing protest transformation into political crowds for blackmail. Distributed Organizing and Radicalization: Activating self-starting networks across boundaries, as in “distributed organizing” blueprints for networked protesting. One post outlines creating conditions to radicalize individuals with “nothing to lose,” condemning actions publicly while orchestrating them covertly. Anarchist left-wing extremism reports highlight violent tactics like arson and sabotage. United Fronts and Electoral Subversion: Building broad alliances for revolution, as in Socialist Review’s call for united fronts amid crises. Posts advocate non-violence and electoralism as tactics, but stress “all methods of resistance” including subversion. Color revolution playbooks detail delaying certifications, mobs, and media pressure to nullify elections. Institutional Penetration and Cultural Warfare: At its core, the radical Left is not interested in incremental improvements or moderate reforms; it seeks a transformative shift that aims to redefine America itself. The Democratic Party serves only as a vehicle for this revolution, a deliberate and strategic choice designed to appeal to mainstream sympathies while quietly advancing an agenda aimed at profound, lasting change. As one commentator in Socialist Review noted, “As the world economic crisis deepens, we shall need the united front more and more,” emphasizing the need for broad unity among radicals to achieve their revolutionary goals. Resistance Labs and similar initiatives tie foreign aid to domestic activism for sabotage and mayhem. The radical Left’s vision is not merely theoretical; it is rooted in a historical context that draws inspiration from past revolutionary movements. As one writer proudly stated, “Bolsheviks gave us a glimpse of a world without oppression and exploitation, patriotism and profit. That’s why I am still proud to be thought of as Bolshy!” This sentiment reflects a longing for a radical reimagining of society, one that resonates with certain factions within the modern Democratic Party. Kirk’s assassination, amid claims of left-wing motives, fits this pattern of escalating from agitation to targeted violence, as seen in historical leftist extremism. As the investigation continues, it appears that Troy Robinson may have been the “Useful Idiot”, amidst a plot contrived in concert with several other Radicals. The radical Left’s strategy of using the Democratic Party as a platform for its revolutionary ambitions is both intentional and strategic. By appealing to mainstream sentiments while advancing a transformative agenda—now potentially including political assassinations—they seek to reshape the very fabric of American society. Remember, you've heard their slogans in the last few years: Land back, abolition of police, prisons and ICE, housing redistribution, universal income, universal healthcare, common-sense gun control, debt forgiveness, living minimum wage, radical climate action. The implications of this movement are profound, as it challenges our core principles and institutions that have long defined the nation. As the radical Left continues to gain traction, it is crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and aware of the true scope of these ambitions, especially in the wake of tragedies like the Kirk assassination that reveal the violent undercurrents of their quest for chaos and revolution. If you've not figured it out yet folks, these Radicals are not playing games, they are playing for keeps! -cmcateer