photo #7285831

ANN KENEVAN on September 13, 2024

35 views

In Album: ANN KENEVAN's Timeline Photos

Dimension: 768 x 1334

File Size: 232.04 Kb

View More View Less

ANN KENEVAN

Harris parents were Inhabitants, NOT Citizens, her mother is from India and her father is from Jamaica, was born in Oakland, California, Kamala Harris is NOT a “natural born Citizen” and absolutely is NOT eligible to be President (or Vice President)! At the time of Kamala Iyer Harris’ birth both her... View MoreHarris parents were Inhabitants, NOT Citizens, her mother is from India and her father is from Jamaica, was born in Oakland, California, Kamala Harris is NOT a “natural born Citizen” and absolutely is NOT eligible to be President (or Vice President)! At the time of Kamala Iyer Harris’ birth both her parents were in the United States on temporary student visas, with the express condition that both were ‘non-immigrant students.'” Neither Kamala Iyer Harris’ mother, Gopalan Shyamala, nor her father, Donald Jasper Harris were Citizens of the United States at the time of Kamala Iyer Harris’ birth. There is a clear and very important distinction between "Natural Born citizen" and a naturalized Citizen or any other type of Citizen even one who is made a Citizen by virtue of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Perhaps if you watch this video and looked at the original source documents you would understand the important distinctions. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States of America: No person except a natural born citizen (not to be confused with a "naturalized citizen"), or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. We are a constitutional republic we are a nation of laws, feelings have NOTHING to to do with it! The original Constitution did not define citizenship, but the 14th Amendment does—and it provides that “all persons born…in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” Those who claim that birth alone is sufficient overlook the second phrase. The person must also be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States, and that meant subject to the complete jurisdiction, not merely a partial jurisdiction such as that which applies to anyone temporarily sojourning in the United States (whether lawfully or unlawfully)… How can we expect our politicians to uphold the rule of law when they, themselves, don’t uphold the law? This must be addressed, sooner rather than later. What Did Our Framers mean by “natural born Citizen”? Our Framers had no need to define “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution, because by the time of the Federal Convention of 1787, a formal definition of the term consistent with the new republican principles already existed in Emer Vattel’s classic, Law of Nations. And we know that our Framers carefully studied and relied upon Vattel’s work. I’ll prove it. How Vattel’s Law of Nations got to the Colonies, and its Influence Here: Vattel on “natural born citizens”, “inhabitants”, and “naturalized citizens”: From our beginning, we were subjects of the British Crown. With the War for Independence, we became citizens. We needed new concepts to fit our new status as citizens. Vattel provided these new republican concepts of “citizenship”. The gist of what Vattel says in Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212-217, is this: § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. § 213: Inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to stay in the country. They are subject to the laws of the country while they reside in it. But they do not participate in all the rights of citizens – they enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. Their children follow the condition of their fathers – they too are inhabitants. § 214: A country may grant to a foreigner the quality of citizen – this is naturalization. In some countries, the sovereign cannot grant to a foreigner all the rights of citizens, such as that of holding public office – this is a regulation of the fundamental law. And in England, merely being born in the country naturalizes the children of a foreigner. §§ 215, 216 & 217: Children born of citizens in a foreign country, at sea, or while overseas in the service of their country, are citizens. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular. Do you see? The republican concept of “natural born citizenship” is radically different from the feudal notion of “natural born subjectship.” Under feudalism, merely being born in the domains of the King made one – by birth – a “natural born subject”. But in Vattel’s Model and Our Constitutional Republic, Citizens are “natural born” only if they are born of Citizens. Feb 12, 2016 This explains "natural born Citizen" in Article II, Sec. 1, clause 5, US Constitution: How our first Presidents were "naturalized citizens" and had to be exempted from the "natural born citizen" (NBC) requirement; shows the common understanding of NBC at the time our Constitution was drafted and ratified; explains 14th Amendment citizenship; and shows why Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are not NBCs. https://youtu.be/h9PxdDvgQks

View Less

Natural Born Citizen Explained! youtu.be

September 13, 2024