photo #6095509

3-22-'24, WBR Live, “Daily constitution”, “Hillbilly Friday”, (pics on wimkin) I had a few questions left over this week. Put them together anyway you prefer (ya will anyway). Just a art project will all that can be made here, but curious. I'll be doing one of those sometime this summer also. A lot of this concept depends on the radioactive decay and a potential 'erosion' of said material by gravitational torsion proximity (at both poles). Is it possible that Antarctica is much 'younger' than now estimated. The -single-measurement of extreme age is a standard of about 100 years old by now. Some of the other Ice core measurements from around the planet don't mesh well with the 415,000-year Antarctic ice core project. There is a lot of things that don't add up in the academia version of Earth's history. The thing is, before you bring up “failed measurement” to academia, you better have the -ALL- receipts for: if the gravitational activity can even be measures now/that small (more atoms on one side of the partition), if the gravitation isotope erosion (even available) is constant or “AC” in the effect, how much variance is required for it to be possible, and (stay with me now) if the activity is predictable. This concept also requires an idea that the Terra on this planet is foreign material (the rock that hit Earth formed the “Pangia(SP?) original continent), to spit the Moon and Kiber belt out the other side. Bonus; if so, it may provide a time/coordinate for the better tracking of said shooting gallery as well. I also mention this, for (look at the other fluid covered planets), life in the cosmos may be of a atmospheric history/land may be scarce). If so, then the crust of Earth may also be floating “greased owl snot” of a mantel, affected to move plate tectonics much easier. Did a close fly by of a north to south massive 'Kiber remnant' pull Antarctica from mid Atlantic to the pole about 75,000 years ago, with “Atlantis” the civilisation that recovered from it? Why(?), Mon.