Drag to reposition your photo

Mikkel Meinike Nielsen

Male. Lives in Farum, Denmark. Born on April 14, 1969. Is in a relationship.

About Me

Joined Groups1

4 Members

Hocus Pocus Scenen

Outreach/Activism

Liked Pages3

1633 Likes

The Resistance

Politics

4 Likes

Resistance Prisme

Company, Organization, or Institution

6712 Likes

Candace Owens

Artist, Band or Public Figure

Mikkel Meinike Nielsen

Report this User

Status Update

Mikkel Meinike Nielsen

January 31, 2021 4:07 am

From my continued dialogue with doctor Sven Felsby "Mikkel, as I said: if your experts were experts, they would have published something and not just given YouTube lectures." What was important for... View MoreFrom my continued dialogue with doctor Sven Felsby "Mikkel, as I said: if your experts were experts, they would have published something and not just given YouTube lectures." What was important for me to illustrate is that there are skilled people with education and professional experience who say these things. I think that is an important message. There is a perception that those who question the existence of Sars-CoV-2 are people with a lively imagination who have looked a little too deep into the nooks and crannies of the internet and now think they are wiser about viruses than the leading virus experts. Therefore, it was important to show that considerations about the scientific evidence for the existence of the virus were shared by people with a high professional level who cared about w scientific evidence. In that it was not about us "not believing in experts" but rather that there is disagreement even among experts. You are now arguing that the experts I am referring to are not as much "real" experts as the ones you are referring to because those I am referring to are using a YouTube video to express themselves. It can be discussed. The important thing for me to show is that the doubts about the proof of Sars-CoV-2 are found among professionals and highly educated and not just among people with lack of insight. It can also be said that the moment experts make a YouTube video, they turn more broadly. They try to share their considerations with people outside their field as well. Researchers who publish to other researchers in a language that few lay people can follow also have a better chance of "cheating" if that is what they want. As long as the content of their dialogue is not available to anyone other than them, they can maintain an expert monopoly on their knowledge. The professionals who make a YouTube video and try to convey their criticism thus open up for both professionals and non-professionals to take part in the critical considerations. Thus, it becomes a democratization of knowledge and dissemination of knowledge. The PDF you have attached is in fact very similar to the documents you have previously linked to. A review of a course during which the virus was isolated. It appears where it took place and who participated and which processes were reviewed and what results emerged. If you had confidence in the researchers who have lived the document, you would say "I believe it when they say it". The thing is that this whole process has developed in a way that a lot of people have lost confidence. It must be said that the document like the one you share here would be quite easy to produce even if some of the scientific processes surrounding the isolation had not emerged in a completely honest way and also even if some of the hard evidence was missing. I hear you say that the virus is isolated many times. I still I question whether that is true. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.972935v1.full.pdf

View Less

Be the first person to like this.

Recent Photos

View More Photos