The Constitution Party (Let genuine freedom ring!)

Group Info

Founder

The mission of the Constitution Party is to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity through the election, at all levels of government, of Constitut... More

Verification

Please login to verify this Groups

Link

PJ Y?havahu ben-Amos Oh

December 20, 2020 6:25 pm

For all those who defended Trump by claiming he said the vaccines won't be mandatory (actually he only said that not everyone will want to get it), after he helped develop at "Warp Speed" while giftin... View MoreFor all those who defended Trump by claiming he said the vaccines won't be mandatory (actually he only said that not everyone will want to get it), after he helped develop at "Warp Speed" while gifting the likes of Gates-backed Moderna half a billion dollars in R&D funds - and later dismissing vaccine hesitancy as politically motivated nonsense - what is the value in a "voluntary" vaccination when there are so many ways and parties that are able to coerce you into getting it? Do you suppose that the only sort of coercion that is problematic is when the military pins you down and stabs/rapes you with a needle? That would be like saying that it wouldn't be problematic, as far as consent is concerned, for someone to deny you basic necessities such as food if you refused to take a harmful and minimally tested drug which has unknown long-term consequences. If people are losing their means of livelihood over a vaccine approved for use by your President, can you really continue to defend him while claiming he never mandated them for everyone? What is a mandate to you if it is something other than a requirement such that refusal results in termination? Notice the following quote made by Megan Cerullo, the reporter for Moneywatch, who is interviewed in the video clip found here: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-19-vaccine-employers-exclude-unvaccinated-workers/ "Employees with sincerely held religious beliefs, for whom it's against their religion to become vaccinated, can also request an exemption under Title VII [of the 1964 Civil Rights Code]. The threshold is higher [than for those requesting exemptions for medical reasons], because they don't want people coming up with bogus religions when it's not something they sincerely believe in." There has been lots of editorials in the mass media claiming that nobody has a right to claim any religious exemptions for vaccinations on the basis that no major religion (except perhaps Christian Science) objects to them. There has even been an article by John D. Grabenstein underwritten by Merck titled "What the World's Religions Teach", which attempts to make a similar argument: http://www.childrenshealthcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Vaccine-Grabenstein-article.pdf What precisely determines whether any given religious belief is held due to one's adherence to a "bogus religion"? Will employers now presumptuously pretend they are experts in all the world's religions so they can deny people requesting exemptions while the employee is now afraid of being replaced by someone who would be willing to go along with the requirement?

View Less