CA voter guide.
NO -- Prop. 2 would waste taxpayer dollars on the wasteful, dumbing down, politically-correct K-12 government schools and community colleges. This $10 BILLION bond would cost much mor... View MoreCA voter guide.
NO -- Prop. 2 would waste taxpayer dollars on the wasteful, dumbing down, politically-correct K-12 government schools and community colleges. This $10 BILLION bond would cost much more than that with high interest, and is more expensive than a direct tax.
NO -- Prop. 3 would permit polygamy, bigamy, child marriages, incestuous marriages (and even people-animal and people-object marriages) by superseding all marriage statutes with an extremely broad and subjective state constitutional amendment claiming “a fundamental right ... to marry” whomever and whatever (the sky’s the limit). Prop. 3 won’t make any practical difference on same-sex marriages, yet by preempting all existing marriage definitions, standards, and limits, this radical proposal opens up “Pandora’s Box.”
NO -- Prop. 4 would fund another lie-based, subsidization of wasteful environmental groups via a $10 BILLION bond, costing taxpayers even more money, and with interest (a bond is always more expensive than a direct tax).
NO -- Prop. 5 would permit higher property taxes (attacking Prop. 13 from 1978) by lowering the “vote threshold from 66.67% to 55% for local special taxes and bond measures to fund housing projects and public infrastructure.” Targets all property owners.
NO -- Prop. 6 would call it “slavery” to make prisoners do work they don’t wish to do. This soft-on-crime proposition would prohibit the Department of Corrections from disciplining (removing privileges from) convicts who refuse their work assignments.
NO -- Prop. 32 would increase the “minimum wage” to $18/hr. for all California employees (killing even more jobs and businesses).
NO -- Prop. 33 would permit cities and counties to impose deceptive “rent control,” which will result in fewer rentals and higher rents, as frustrated landlords sell their rental houses and duplexes to become primary residences, and as developers lack investors to build new rentals.
YES -- Prop. 34 would require AIDS Healthcare Foundation of Los Angeles, notorious for misspending taxpayer dollars, “to spend 98% of revenues from the federal discount prescription drug program on direct patient care.”
NO -- Prop. 35 would permanently tax health insurers to pay for the state's “Medi-Cal” welfare program, which will hike insurance costs for the rest of us.
YES -- Prop. 36 would increase penalties for theft and fentanyl possession, and repeal the worst parts of Prop. 47 from 2014. Equipping county district attorneys to prosecute, it would send the message to would-be robbers that retail theft is a crime again.
.
Real men are courageous and loving
For details about this sermon and for related resources, click here:
https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/81-82To receive John MacArthur’s monthly let...
StellaEscobedo on Instagram: "🚨WATCH🚨New California bill would make illegal immigrants eligible for first time homebuyer loans.
Congressional candidate @bill_wells_mayor opposes it."
26K likes, 6,561 comments - stellaingerescobedo on March 7, 2024: "🚨WATCH🚨New California bill would make illegal immigrants eligible for first time homebuyer loans.
Congressional candidate @bill_wel..
page=1&profile_user_id=223769&year=&month=
Load More
