Drag to reposition your photo

Victoria Lewis

Female. Lives in New York, United States. Born on May 2, 1956. Is married.

About Me

Patriot, Republican/libertarian, wife, mom to 3, Mimi to 12

Liked Pages2

192 Likes

Bridging the Gaps Dyslexia Center

Company, Organization, or Institution » Education

157 Likes

Photography by Tennille Diane

Brand or Product

Victoria Lewis

Report this User

Status Update

Victoria Lewis shared

December 20, 2020 6:31 pm

Tom Grimshaw

December 19, 2020 10:33 pm

VACCINE SUMMARY by my very aware and prolific writer, Steve Cook Sometimes to get a message through the noise and distractions you have to be very persistent and willing to repeat, reissue, rephrase ... View MoreVACCINE SUMMARY by my very aware and prolific writer, Steve Cook Sometimes to get a message through the noise and distractions you have to be very persistent and willing to repeat, reissue, rephrase and restate it over and over until it sinks in. Signs are though that it is sinking in and the COVID hoax is unraveling but these things don't always happen overnight so keep at it. Hence the following (preview). TITLE: V@x Wars The story so far There is some sort of bug. It hasn't been isolated yet, photographed or physically seen through a microscope but we are assured by experts that it is or must be there. It is, though, very, very similar in its effects to viruses referred to collectively and colloquially as "the flu" or "the common cold". It behaves like a flu bug in so far as it can be unpleasant for some but is not a big deal for the vast majority of people who get mild or moderate symptoms for a bit before it goes away. Like a flu (or indeed a cold for the very frail/elderly) it can be more serious in some people who are elderly or already weakened from other illnesses. Unlike a regular flu, which can afflict children or young people, the COVID bug has little effect on the young (unless in rare cases they are already extremely ill with some other ailment.) If it had been referred to as "a flu" no one would have freaked out. As the goal was to make people freak out and cower in terror it had to have another name not at all similar to "flu". Hence, "COVID19". A test has been widely used to detect whether someone has COVID. Often this is the only way they can know they have it because the symptoms are so mild or non existent. The test is called the PCR test and it is purportedly more accurate than other tests such as the one used at airports which, per the gov, is only 7% accurate. The gov claims that the PCR test only returns a false positive in about 2% of people tested. The gov would never lie to us, not even to enrich or further the agenda of its pals, as it is well known to comprise people incapable of lying. Therefore, we must believe what they say and accept this "2%" claim as honest and accurate. Unfortunately 2% of people tested accounts for almost all the positive cases "identified". But then another embarrassing problem arose. It turned out that the much-vaunted PCR test cannot actually detect the presence of alive infectious virus. What it does detect is small trace remnants of the DNA of previous infections with Coronaviruses (which include what are referred to as "colds and flu" as well as the fancy-named COVID19. Therefore, even for the small number of genuine positives as opposed to false positives, the test dos not establish that the person actually has a live virus in their system. The government knows all this. If it does not know this, it is the most irresponsibly stupid government in history and all its "experts" should be stapled to the walls of the Houses of Parliament so people can chuck eggs at them - only kidding (ish). So we have a situation where nearly all the "positives" identified by the PCR test are false and even those that aren't do not prove the existence of the virus. Yet the positive results are claimed by the gov to prove that the person is a "COVID case". Per government figures, this amounts to about 500 000 falsely claimed cases (2% of the 26.000,000 million tests done). These thousands of "cases" are fraudulently used by the gov as "evidence" that the COVID virus is spreading and this bogus spread of a "dangerous disease" is used as the justification for lockdowns and other methods of destroying the country. The government is fond of using propaganda trigger words when talking about the fraudulent evidence for the spread of this infection. Thus it refers to it repeatedly as this "dangerous disease". Yet the actual evidence and statistics - and even the CMO himself - tell us that whilst the bug is (like a cold or the flu) dangerous for someone very elderly and/or very, it is not actually, so far as the overwhelming majority of people are concerned, more dangerous than flu. In fact, it might even be slightly less dangerous. The similarities of symptoms, together with a drop this year in the number of flu cases apparently commensurate with the appearance of COVID cases, suggest that cases that in earlier years would simply have been referred to as "flu" have this year been reclassified as "Covid". This reclassification, if true and if done on a big enough scale, would of itself create sufficient "COVID" numbers to create the impression of a "COVID outbreak." It is also possible, although as far as we know not yet proven, that COVID has been in circulation for many years prior to its being allegedly identified as a distinct virus. It was simply regarded as a mild, medium or bad flu. Deaths from it, if such occurred, would in that instance merely have been recorded as deaths arising from complications in elderly or vulnerable peole infected with flu. If it turns out that the COVID virus existed and has been in circulation for a long time, there may already be considerable immunity to it built up in the community. This may account for why a fraudulent test and its resultant fraudulent positives are needed to create suitably alarming "infection" numbers. The deaths stats for instance are not particularly high, which is why the gov keeps focusing attention on their false infection stats. Yet even the not particularly scary death stats are false. A COVID death is counted when a person dies within 28 days of testing positive for COVID19. But as we have seen, the widespread use of tests that do not do what it is claimed they do means that the considerable majority, if not all, of the "COVID cases" are false. Therefore an unknown but probably high percentage of deaths counted as "COVID" deaths are false. So we have essentially an "epidemic" based on smoke and mirrors - false stats and propaganda utterances relayed by government ministers, the media, and the big tech companies of the internet. The smoke and mirrors epidemic contrasts sharply with observable reality. Observable reality contradicts what one would expect to see happening if a killer epidemic were actually happening in the real world - there no over-full hospitals operating at crisis levels, no bodies stacking up at undertakers, many people not knowing a single person who has died of the alleged COVID disease, children virtually unaffected, the average age of alleged COVID related mortality being as year OLDER (82) than the average age of death from all causes etc. In order to "save us from" the smoke-and-mirrors, talked up epidemic of false positives and false stats, new vaccines are rushed through without the requisite and commonsense years of trials and tests to ensure they are safe and effective. The testing was so negligent that only AFTER the vaccine was injected into people did it become evident that anyone prone to allergic reactions should avoid it. This should have been picked up during testing and trails but wasn't. How could such a glaring error show up so early? It then emerged that the vax companies, when selecting people for their vaccine trials, WEEDED OUT anyone likely to have an allergic reaction! So in order to vaccinate ourselves against a bug that is not particularly threatening to most of us, we are expected to risk the improperly tested new vaccines whose short, mid and long term effects NOBODY KNOWS. It might (MIGHT ) turn out that they are not particularly any more dangerous than any other vaccine but at this stage we do not know. We have to wait and see what happens over the next months and years to anyone brave enough to have offered themselves up as unpaid guinea pigs. The gov thinks that it is perfectly okay to take such gambles with the health of millions of people in order to deal with an epidemic that is mostly trickery and fakery. The vax producers however are so non-confident of what their vaccines will do that they asked for and got from the government protection against prosecution should their formulas kill or harm anyone injected with them. It has now transpired that the manufacturers cannot say that their vax prevents one from getting the virus or transmitting the virus as these things have not yet been tested for and proven. In a real epidemic that constitutes a serious threat, if a safe and workable vaccine came to our rescue the first people to be administered it would be our lords and masters, nobs and toffs, royalty, moguls, ministers and captains of this and that. However, in the case of this particular alleged epidemic the nobs and toffs, ministers and royalty are not first in line. The plebs who offer themselves up as unpaid guinea pigs in a country turned into a giant pharmaceutical test lab can go first. Don't all rush at once.

View Less