I f you live in a place that restricts, or, limits the number of days you can display them please read this.....
This from Google for everyone's general information.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled ... View MoreI f you live in a place that restricts, or, limits the number of days you can display them please read this.....
This from Google for everyone's general information.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the display of political and other types of signs on residential property is a unique, important, and protected means of communication and towns cannot restrict the display of such signs. The decision has not been overturned. In a 1994 case, the Court upheld lower court rulings declaring an ordinance that bans residential signs an unconstitutional restriction on the freedom of speech (City of Ladue, et al. v. Margaret P. Gilleo, 114 S.Ct. 2038). The Ladue, Missouri ordinance banned all residential signs (with some exceptions) to minimize visual clutter in the town. A resident sued, alleging that the ordinance violated her right to free speech by prohibiting her from displaying a sign stating �For Peace in the Gulf� from her home. The District Court found the ordinance unconstitutional, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court agreed, finding that the town's interest in regulating signs does not outweigh its residents' right to free speech.
***The supreme court being the highest court in the land, it's rulings are absolute.
And according to them a political sign is protected under the
1st amendment of the constitution.***
page=1&profile_user_id=62907&year=&month=
Load More
