Drag to reposition your photo

Dawn White

Female. Lives in United States. Is married.

About Me

Wife, mother of 3 and grandmother of 7. I'm pro Trump! I believe in God! I'm against pedophiles! I... View More

Joined Groups3

4814 Members

THE STORM

Qanon

1309 Members

The Satanic Cabal's Connection To The Entertainment Industry

Qanon

56 Members

The Voiceless

Save Our Children

Liked Pages11

95 Likes

Occupy Dummycrats

Entertainment » Fictional Character

787 Likes

President Trump Hangs Out Here.

Entertainment

3308 Likes

NewsMax

Company, Organization, or Institution » Media/News/Publishing

Dawn White

Report this User

Status Update

Dawn White

August 6, 2021 8:43 am

*Please please share far and wide* LETTER FOR CARE (AND OTHER) STAFF DECLINING "MANDATORY" VACCINATION Dear [name],... View More*Please please share far and wide* LETTER FOR CARE (AND OTHER) STAFF DECLINING "MANDATORY" VACCINATION Dear [name], I am in receipt of a letter from you, titled "New [employer name] Vaccination Policy", dated [date]. This letter states that it is the new "policy" of the [employer name] Group to require compulsory COVID-19 vaccinations for all workers I am writing to you today because I do not wish to receive any COVID-19 vaccination, and I want to ensure the [employer name] Group is adequately informed on its legal obligations towards me regarding my legal right to decline this vaccination and not face any penalties, such as terminated employment, as a result. Multiple medical ethics laws and international human rights' treaties make it abundantly clear that all medical processes must have the voluntary, informed consent of the human subject, and this consent must be offered freely and in the absence of any coercion. Clearly, predicating continued employment on vaccination status is acutely coercive, and, therefore, cannot be legally enforced, as is enshrined in law by UNESCO's Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which states at Article 6, section 1: "Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice." (1) Underscoring my rights to decline vaccinations I do not wish to receive is the fact there is no clause in my contract stating that I must submit to medical processes in order to retain my employment. Therefore, this cannot legally be introduced as a clause of employment now. Clearly, it would represent a gravely dangerous situation, both legally and ethically, were employers able to alter employee contracts at will to compel employees to receive certain medical processes as a condition of continuing their employment. An employer could use such a clause to compel employees to take medications against their will, to have medical devices implanted into their bodies, or even to be sterilised. History dictates that none of this is beyond the realms of possibility, once involuntary medicalisation becomes socially accepted, and, in fact, it was precisely the existence of compelled, non-consensual medicine, and the inevitable atrocities this leads to, that led to the production of the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code, as you may be aware, was developed as a result of the Nuremberg trials, where Nazi war criminals, primarily doctors who conducted inhumane and unethical human medical experiments, were held accountable for their crimes. The Nuremberg trials concluded in the development of the Nuremberg Code, which focused specifically on preventing unethical medical experimentation on human beings. The Nuremberg Code states: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion." (2) Clearly, and as I have detailed earlier in this correspondence, preconditioning my continued employment on receipt of a vaccine is deeply coercive, and, therefore, it is in breach of the Nuremberg Code, which has been strictly observed all across the civilised world since the horrors of World War II were exposed and their perpetrators brought to justice. It is critical for the [employer name] Group to recognise that the COVID-19 vaccines do constitute human medical experimentation, since the vaccines are still in clinical trials, which will not be complete until 2023 (3). This is why the injections are licensed for emergency purposes only, and do not have a general approval for use (4).

View Less

Recent Photos

View More Photos