Hypocritical Zuckerberg Caught Blasting ‘Experimental’ Covid Jabs To Inner Circle
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been caught blasting the Covid-19 jabs to his inner circle, describing the jabs as “experimental” and warning his staff to be very cautious about the unproven “g
First order of business is to create food shortages. Second order of business is to create an agency to allegedly fix the problem they just created. And the third order of business is to control the p... View MoreFirst order of business is to create food shortages. Second order of business is to create an agency to allegedly fix the problem they just created. And the third order of business is to control the population by starving those who refuse to comply.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/netherlands-partnered-with-wef-to-subvert-global-food-ahead-of-farm-bans-gates-involved_4589507.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2022-07-11-1&utm_medium=email2&est=7blDOzD6POoRGajMqeGrVo0F94mcbQFQgXpJGroJb7PxkScyDYaNAvgUFiS%2B7EJVh5BkSt8aiQ%3D%3D
Fuckerberg will likely pull this down so I am re-posting on other media sites.
Netherlands Partnered with WEF to Subvert Global Food Ahead of Farm Bans; Bill Gates Involved
Behind government restrictions in the Netherlands that could force farms to close is an agreement last year between ...
This is an open request of the fact checkers of Facebook.
I will keep everyone posted as to the outcome of this issue.
The below statements were recently published by a national polling outfit call... View MoreThis is an open request of the fact checkers of Facebook.
I will keep everyone posted as to the outcome of this issue.
The below statements were recently published by a national polling outfit called "yougov"
Of these statements I would like to have the "factcheckers" please let us all know just how many of them are correct, and how many are incorrect.
None of the bullshit "your comments do not meet with our guidelines crap. I am asking you to point out which statements you believe are erroneous, and which ones are true.
I think this is more than fair.
However, If this post is pulled without adequate explanation an exact copy of this post will be sent to all of the other social media sites I have at my disposal.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN CLARIFYING THIS SITUATION.
ps CLAIMING THAT THE POLLING AGENCY IS NOT LEGITIMATE IS UNACCEPTABLE.
We are all interested in what you have to say specifically on the matter.
"PERCEPTIONS" OF THE TRUTH
A recent poll was conducted by a national polling outfit, "YouGov.”
Results to these questions asked of average people on the street.
What percentage of the country is black? Answers 41%. Actual, 12%
What percentage is "Latino?” Answers 39%. Actual numbers 17%
How many families make over $500,000 a year? Answers 26%. Actual figure? 1% (We think a quarter of the country is rich).
What percent of Americans are vegetarians? Response? 30% Actual? 5%
What percent of Americans live in NY city? Answers? 30% Actual 3%.
What percentage of Americans’ are 'transgender? 22% Actual number, 1% (People believe this BS!)
What percentage of your fellow citizens are Gay? Result? 30% Actual 3%
So why do people have such inaccurate thoughts on these counts? THE MEDIA! The media run race, gender, and wealth stories constantly. Result? You are being brainwashed by the national left with the media. Hitler’s propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels would be proud if he had half the success.
Disney just went full-on "gender" They will no longer welcome guests with the traditional "Welcome ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls" Why? Because 1% of the population dictates to the other 99% (that would be the vast majority) and corporate America falls for it!
Regardless of what you think? Less than 20% of Americans use "Twitter" yet Twitter controls 80% of public opinion, why? The media.
Here is another stat that MEDIA refuses to ever mention. America is 12%, Black.
So black men make up about 6% to 6.5% of the population. That small number is responsible for over half the murders annually in America!
Next time you are thinking Americans’ have changed and not in a good way, remember, it's fake. It's all a lie. Most people think just like you do, but the media has brainwashed Americans with constant broadcasting of "LIES!”
Now I’m no lawyer but it seems to me that insisting that people accept unproven experimental vaccinations, or that children can be allowed to determine what sex they “want” to be well before they are ... View MoreNow I’m no lawyer but it seems to me that insisting that people accept unproven experimental vaccinations, or that children can be allowed to determine what sex they “want” to be well before they are of the age of consent, is in clear violation of this code, and is in effect a war crime.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996.
CIRP Introduction
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extened into general codes of medical ethics.
________________________________________
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
________________________________________
Cite as:
• The Nuremberg Code (1947) In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Schuman, 1949: xxiii-xxv.
________________________________________
(File revised 09 June 2002)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s92UMJNjPIA
makes me want to buy their razors even though I use an electric razor!
Jeremy’s Razors: The Greatest Commercial Ever
A year ago, Harry’s Razors advertised on our shows. But then, they pulled their ads due to “values misalignment." Harry’s apparently decided that conservativ...
https://ipatriot.com/cdc-quietly-rates-down-number-of-child-covid-deaths-because-of-coding-error/
Coding errors my ass! There was no coding error. The numbers were intentionally inflated in order to ... View Morehttps://ipatriot.com/cdc-quietly-rates-down-number-of-child-covid-deaths-because-of-coding-error/
Coding errors my ass! There was no coding error. The numbers were intentionally inflated in order to float the Biden Shipwreck. Now that the public is finally wising up to the scam they're slowly coming out with the facts. Not too quickly though, because if they did that they'd be exposed for the scumbags they are.
CDC Quietly Rates Down Number of Child COVID Deaths Because of 'Coding Error' • Warner Todd Huston •
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have quietly rated downward the number of children who have died from COVID.
page=1&profile_user_id=267482&year=&month=
Load More
