photo #9341945

Robert on 17 hours ago

3 views

Johnny A. -

Being a former pilot, I’m WELL aware of what contrails are and how they’re formed. Whether it’s compressed air that vaporizes on wingtips, or cause by the moisture that all engines expel and temperature’s effects(which actually dissipate in well under an hour), chemtrails are undeniable. The skies where I live get peppered with grids patterns of them. They last for hours, but more importantly, they create cirrus looking clouds as they linger. I’ve seen them create fairly large cloud sets too. The govt will NEVER fess up nor will they disclose what else may be in them. Hell, if they CIA fogged San Fran decades ago with psychoactive “fog”, they’ll do ANYTHING the cabal wants

Roseanne S. -

This is a covert military operation much like the building of the nuclear bomb! Very compartmentalized! Over 800 Air Force military bases globally are compliant! Its a beast! In New England it’s being deployed from pease Air Force base in Portsmouth NH and Hanscom field in Bedford Ma.

In Album: Robert's Timeline Photos

Dimension: 526 x 701

File Size: 38.88 Kb

View More View Less

Robert

Comment from Patrick Lawrence to Johnny A. - First, contrails absolutely can last for hours. The claim that genuine contrails “dissipate in well under an hour” is simply false. The FAA says most disappear within seconds or minutes, but in cold, ice-supersaturated air, persistent contrails can remain... View MoreComment from Patrick Lawrence to Johnny A. - First, contrails absolutely can last for hours. The claim that genuine contrails “dissipate in well under an hour” is simply false. The FAA says most disappear within seconds or minutes, but in cold, ice-supersaturated air, persistent contrails can remain for hours or even days. Second, contrails spreading into cirrus-like cloud is not evidence of chemtrails. It is exactly what atmospheric science predicts contrails can do. Persistent ice crystals take up moisture from the surrounding air, spread under upper-level winds and can develop into contrail cirrus. Third, the grid patterns aren't mysterious either. Aircraft travel along established routes at different headings and altitudes. Where routes cross and atmospheric conditions favour persistent contrails, crossed lines and grids are exactly what you would expect. And then we arrive at the enormous practical problem with the conspiracy theory. Think about how many people would have to know. Pilots, cabin crew, aircraft engineers, ground crews, fuel suppliers, fuel-testing laboratories, aircraft manufacturers, engine manufacturers, airport employees, air-traffic controllers, maintenance companies, chemical manufacturers, tanker drivers, logistics companies, environmental regulators, meteorologists, atmospheric scientists and thousands upon thousands of other people across dozens of countries. This supposedly enormous worldwide spraying programme has apparently operated for decades involving commercial aviation across national borders, yet nobody has produced a verifiable aircraft spraying system, chemical supply chain, procurement contract, fuel sample or credible documentary evidence demonstrating it. And there's an even more obvious problem: all these people live underneath the same sky. The pilots supposedly spraying the chemicals go home to their children. Aircraft engineers breathe the same air. Government employees breathe it. Politicians breathe it. The people supposedly manufacturing the chemicals breathe it. Their wives, husbands, parents and grandchildren breathe it. So we're expected to believe that potentially hundreds of thousands or millions of ordinary people are either knowingly participating in or concealing a worldwide poisoning programme that also poisons themselves and their own families, while maintaining extraordinary international secrecy. Finally, the San Francisco reference is muddled. There really were disgraceful secret US experiments involving biological agents, and the CIA really did conduct unethical LSD experiments. The fact that governments have secretly done bad things does not establish that this completely different thing is happening. That's a non sequitur. Historical wrongdoing is evidence for the historical wrongdoing, not evidence for whatever conspiracy someone wants to attach to it. Being a former pilot doesn't rescue the argument. In fact, claiming that ordinary contrails cannot persist for hours while using their persistence as the principal evidence for “chemtrails” means the central premise of the argument is factually wrong. My reply — How much are the checks worth that you are cashing? Asking for all the people who know you're lying.

View Less

1 16 hours ago Edited