photo #931599

Jason on January 13, 2021

534 views

I was just contacted by the WSJ. Interview tomorrow on how we plan to disallow "organization of acts of violence." I will post my official statement here. In the meantime, Apple has removed us and it seems Google is about to ban our ad accounts which is really the only way we create revenue. If you'd like to bring people here, even if Apple users, they can sign up at www.wimkin.com and use the web version until we make either Wimkin "compatible" with Apple, or we place it on our site to be downloaded. Strength really is in numbers. We need users now more than ever. Thank you as always for your support and understanding. ????

In Album: Jason's Timeline Photos

Dimension: 948 x 536

File Size: 89.05 Kb

View More View Less

342

View previous comments

3/73

Dayne Harris

Cant u just start a new one with a different name and link it like u do an email ?

January 13, 2021

RockyMtnTex

These are the facts: 1. Trump specified peaceful protest when asking people to rally. 2. Antifa posted that they would infiltrate the rally. 3. Known Antifa members took pictures of themselves in pro Trump hats and clothing.... View MoreThese are the facts: 1. Trump specified peaceful protest when asking people to rally. 2. Antifa posted that they would infiltrate the rally. 3. Known Antifa members took pictures of themselves in pro Trump hats and clothing. 4. The group who breached the capitol building were there in place before Trump started speaking. 5. The timings make it physically impossible to have both listened to Trump's speech and breach the capitol building. 6. This means they were doing this INSTEAD of listening to Trump, not DUE TO anything said by Trump. 7. There was not one word in Trump's speech encouraging violence. 8. No media source has been able to cite one statement from Trump encouraging violence. 9. Trump's first comments after the breach and as soon as he was made aware of it are instructions to be peaceful. 10. Once again millions of column inches of hate and incitement to violence directed against Trump and Trump voters has resulted from mainstream media reporting bias. 11.Once again an evidence free, or rather directly contrary to known evidence impeachment is immediately launched by Pelosi. 12.Once again multiple direct incitements to violence and rioting from Pelosi are ignored. Past statements in which she supported activists breaking into the capitol building are ignored. 13. There is no evidence linking Trump in any way to the 'storming' of the capitol building. 14. There is strong evidence that entry was gained not by storming barricades but by having doors and entrances opened by the police and being allowed in. 15. Writing to the Pentagon and VP in an attempt to have the President removed and the nuclear codes seized, as Pelosi did, could pretty easily itself fit the definition of an insurrection. 16.Urging capitol police not to confront activists who had invaded the building in 2018, as Pelosi did, is again a more direct example of condoning insurrection that anything said by Trump. 17.Launching multiple specious impeachment charges against a serving President based solely on hatred of that President and contrary to established evidence is YET AGAIN closer to the definition of insurrection than anything Trump has said or done. 18. Supporting massive electoral fraud to reverse a result and remove a legitimate President is again a form of insurrection. 19. Blocking all proper investigation of this electoral fraud or refusing to examine the evidence fairly, as all official parties and the media have done, would if proven to be a deliberate attempt to aid a false result also fit the definition of insurrection. 20. Silencing accounts, individuals, companies and groups that wish to discuss these matters contravenes the constitutional right to free speech, as well as AGAIN if deliberate to aid an illegitimate result fitting the definition of insurrection.

View Less

5 January 14, 2021

Cody Joyner

https://signal.org/install

1 January 14, 2021