Roger
on February 13, 2026
10 views
AOC and the Dems are freaking out. She says it’s “disturbing” that AG Pam Bondi’s DOJ would preserve the search histories of members of Congress who view the unredacted Epstein files.
AOC: "It's disturbing that Pam Bondi had—um, they had preserved essentially, as you mentioned, search histories of sitting members of Congress on the Epstein files. They were looking at what members of Congress were looking at, and they were using that, importantly, as ammunition against them, their own search histories, against them in a hearing by Pam Bondi.
I think that we all saw today the performance that she had. She was screaming, thrashing, and I think it is because she knows that she is implicated in a massive cover-up to protect a powerful ring of pedophiles. Through the redactions, the redactions of the names of perpetrators, the holding of three million files, the moving of the—the unexplained moving of Ghislaine Maxwell into a new cushy facility, all of these things are what she personally oversaw. And that's before even digging into whatever questions may arise from her history in Florida.
And I think that her thrashing and her very erratic performance today pointed to the fact that there are real questions that point to the DOJ under her leadership and her leadership specifically, as well as her role in all of this."
It would be disturbing if this history wasn’t preserved. Democrat lawmakers can’t be trusted with anything.
It’s also funny that Democrats think they “caught” Bondi with anything—as if the DOJ didn’t anticipate that any page of Bondi’s binder could be photographed during the hearing.
AOC and her crazy eyes will never understand anything.
(zeteonews on TT)
Dimension: 867 x 1023
File Size: 52.54 Kb
Be the first person to like this.
Rene Hollan
Except that's normal for all websites. I mean, if I were to Google "How best to kill a Democrat Member of Congress," I would use a good no-logging VPN. Not that I would do such a search.
1
1
February 13, 2026 Edited