photo #8699215

These two are the purest examples of those who wish to be your King & Queen.Some of the greatest examples of Biden’s attitude, as King, was how he handle mandates related to COVID. Most never realized that mandates are contrary to laws, but who cares when you behave as a king.Failed COVID Mandates and Political MotivationsSeveral COVID-19 mandates enacted during the pandemic, particularly those associated with Dr. Anthony Fauci and President Biden, have faced significant scrutiny regarding their motivations and effectiveness. Here are key examples of mandates that have been criticized as politically motivated or ineffective:1. Vaccine MandatesFederal Vaccine Mandates: The Biden administration issued mandates for vaccinations among federal employees and within large businesses. These mandates faced numerous legal challenges and were partially struck down by the Supreme Court in January 2022, raising questions about their legal foundation and political motivations.2. Mask MandatesSchool and Public Space Mask Mandates: Mask requirements in schools and public spaces were often enforced inconsistently. Critics argued that these mandates were more about political control than scientific necessity, especially as evidence emerged regarding the efficacy of masks.3. Travel RestrictionsInternational Travel Restrictions: Various travel bans and restrictions aimed at containing COVID-19, particularly those targeting certain countries, have been criticized for their uneven application and political motivations, as they often did not reflect the scientific consensus on virus transmission.4. Public Health MessagingChanging Guidelines: The shifting guidelines regarding mask usage, social distancing, and vaccination efficacy contributed to public confusion. Critics accused the administration of altering guidelines based on political pressures rather than emerging scientific evidence.5. Controversial TreatmentsRegulatory Barriers to Early Treatments: The focus on vaccines over alternative treatments (like monoclonal antibodies) was seen by some as a politically motivated strategy to support vaccine companies and narratives, rather than a balanced approach to public health.