photo #8429066

October 7 wasn’t just a turning point — it was a catalyst, a rupture carefully framed to serve much larger ambitions than revenge or defense.The world was told that Israel, with its state-of-the-art surveillance, AI border control systems, and the most fortified fence on earth, was caught off guard by a ragtag militant force crossing on paragliders and bulldozers. But that doesn’t match the reality of the border itself — a digital fortress monitored by every possible form of real-time intelligence — nor does it explain how the IDF, famed for its speed and precision, remained effectively inactive for hours while chaos unfolded just minutes from their command centers.And when you examine how Israel responded — with unprecedented force and no restraint, reducing Gaza to rubble and driving out much of its population — it’s impossible not to notice how efficiently the horror of that day was converted into total political license. The goal, it seems, was never just retaliation — it was the removal of an obstacle.What makes this harder to ignore is the deeper historical context. Hamas, the enemy Israel claims it must destroy at all costs, didn’t emerge in a vacuum. In fact, Israeli officials have openly acknowledged their role in Hamas’s early rise. Brigadier General Yitzhak Segev, the IDF’s governor in Gaza during the 1980s, told the New York Times he helped finance the Islamist movement to weaken the secular, nationalist PLO under Yasser Arafat. Another former official, Avner Cohen, went even further, telling the Wall Street Journal in 2009: “Hamas is Israel’s creation.”So when Netanyahu goes before the world — as he did at the UN — and declares that Hamas is ISIS, and when he repeats the line after October 7 that Hamas must be crushed like ISIS was, he’s not just making a comparison. He’s manufacturing a moral framework that turns this war into a righteous crusade, one where anything becomes justifiable: mass civilian deaths, forced displacement, the destruction of a people’s entire civic infrastructure — all of it framed as a necessary evil to defeat barbarism.But the deeper layer here, and what few in the West are willing to say aloud, is that while Gaza burns, a much older dream is moving closer to reality. On the hills around Jerusalem, red heifers are being raised and burned in practice rituals drawn directly from the Torah. Priests are being trained, Temple vessels are being prepared, and institutions like the Temple Institute are actively laying the groundwork for rebuilding the Third Temple — not metaphorically, but physically, on the very site where the Al-Aqsa Mosque stands.This isn’t fringe. These movements have deep ties to Israeli political power, particularly to the religious Zionist factions that now help shape government policy. For these groups, the war in Gaza is not just an opportunity for military domination — it is a prophetic realignment. They believe that Jewish sovereignty over the Temple Mount is not only a national right, but a divine imperative. And with the international community distracted or complicit, and with Palestinians increasingly scattered and silenced, they are closer than ever to changing the status of the most contested religious site on Earth.This is the part of the story that’s not supposed to be told — that what we’re witnessing may not be a war for security, but a war for symbolism, legacy, and theology. A war to redraw not just borders but the spiritual map of the region.So whether or not October 7 was engineered, allowed, or simply used, the outcome is clear. Gaza is being erased. Jerusalem is being reshaped. And what comes next may have far less to do with politics and far more to do with prophecy.