photo #8061663

ANN KENEVAN on March 11, 2025

8 views

In Album: ANN KENEVAN's Timeline Photos

Dimension: 436 x 610

File Size: 35.03 Kb

View More View Less

Be the first person to like this.

ANN KENEVAN

SAUL ALINSKY’S RULES FOR RADICALS CHAOS AND CONFUSION! The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted -- a ... View MoreSAUL ALINSKY’S RULES FOR RADICALS CHAOS AND CONFUSION! The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted -- a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than that status quo's complete collapse -- to be followed by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins. Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal "changes" are needed. Stage 1, The “Crisis”: Some situation exists, whose negative aspects the anointed [leftists] propose to eliminate. Such a situation is routinely characterized as a “crisis” … even though evidence is seldom asked or given to show how the situation at hand is either uniquely bad or threatening to get worse. Sometimes the situation described as a “crisis” has in fact already been getting better for years. Stage 2, The “Solution”: Policies to end the “crisis” are advocated by the anointed, who say that these policies will lead to beneficial result A. Critics say that these policies will lead to detrimental result Z. The anointed dismiss these latter claims as absurd and “simplistic,” if not dishonest. Stage 3, The Results: The policies are instituted and lead to detrimental result Z. Stage 4, The Response: Those who attribute detrimental result Z to the policies instituted are dismissed as “simplistic” for ignoring the “complexities” involved, as “many factors” went into determining the outcome. The burden of proof is on the critics to demonstrate to a certainty that these policies alone were the only possible cause of the worsening that occurred. No burden of proof whatever is put on those who had so confidently predicted improvement. Indeed it is often asserted that things would have been even worse, were it not for the wonderful programs that mitigated the inevitable damage from other factors. https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/other/tactics-

View Less

Discover the Networks www.discoverthenetworks.org

March 11, 2025

Diane Thomas

POS. Can't stand the arrogant bastard.

1 March 11, 2025