Coincidence? The first map was published in 1894, the second map was published in Orwell’s “1984” book. Given the transition of our current financial systems and their formerly recognized borders, the current restructuring of the global financial markets are starting to look even more Orwellian. Is our interpretation of the “New World Order” maybe off the mark a touch? Perhaps it’s not just Klaus who wants to control the world through technocracy. New world order does not mean one world order or one world government alone. Perhaps there are competitors who are willing to use that same allure of control through technocracy, but to a different end? The ability and opportunity for abuse of technology is immeasurable, from all sides. Will there be one controlling evil of the world, or will perhaps 3 equally evil but different forms of control emerge? It’s the same cycle, is the gun evil or is the person who wields the gun. The technocracy we face is evil, the technology is inert. The paradox of the human condition prevails.
In Album: Wayne Peters's Timeline Photos
Dimension:
2208 x 1242
File Size:
473.96 Kb
Like (1)
Loading...

Martin Thompson
This hypothesis (if it can be called other than foresight) has historical support.
Two opposing forces joining together to divide a third, more powerful force, has precedence.
1
1
