Lee sapo
on September 13, 2021
4 views
๐Ÿงฌ๐ˆ๐Ÿ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐‡๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐•๐š๐ฑ๐ž๐ ๐˜๐จ๐ฎ ๐€๐ซ๐ž ๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐Ž๐ฐ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐€๐ง๐ ๐‡๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐๐จ ๐Œ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐œ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐“๐จ ๐‡๐”๐Œ๐€๐ ๐‘๐ˆ๐†๐‡๐“๐’๐Ÿงฌ
Donโ€™t take my word on it, there are rulings in the Supreme Courts...... interesting
Supreme Court 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics
โœ–๏ธThe Vaxed Can Be Patented (Owned)โœ–๏ธ
In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 - Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc - the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is 'a product of nature'.
However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court wrote that if you were to change a human's genome by mRNA vaccines (being used currently) then the (altered) genome CAN be patented.
This means that everyone who has had the 'vaccine' is now technically 'patented'. Anything that is patented is 'owned' and comes under the definition of 'trans human'.
All people who are legally identified as being 'trans human' do not have access to Human Rights or any Rights granted by the State. That is because they are not classified as anything 100% organic or human.
Therefore, technically, anyone having this 'vaccine' can no longer have any access to Human Rights. There have been a few legal papers discussing this recently, so there should be clarification on this soon. As of now, the high court ruling stands.
Full Supreme Court Ruling
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
And for those that want relevance in Australia, because that makes such a difference ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ. If it happens anywhere in the world itโ€™s going to happen here FYI.
https://www.smh.com.au/business/myriad-genetics-wins-bid-to-patent-human-genes-20130215-2ehfm.html
Dimension: 592 x 765
File Size: 52.32 Kb
Like (2)
Loading...
2