Mark Poulin
on June 30, 2021
3 views
Okay, let us talk reality for five seconds:
If an adult trespasser comes onto my land and throws a baby through my window, I cannot shoot the baby legally.
I can shoot the adult baby fenestrator, because he is a reasonable threat to me and to the baby. He is trespassing and committing acts of violence against a baby and my property.
The baby cannot knowingly nor effectively carry out acts of violent aggression against me, so shooting it for "trespassing" it had no say in is a violation of the baby's right to life.
Sex is short for sexual reproduction. If you consent to sexual reproduction, then you consent to the results: reproduction of humans. If you are being raped, just like the baby fenestrator, you should, or are at least are justified in, shooting a rapist in the act of raping you or attempting to rape you; rape can kill so it is reasonable to use lethal force to defend your rights. You don't have the right to murder the child who cannot comprehend that a law has been broken nor a right violated, and who did not, and cannot effectively, act in a way to violate your rights. The baby did not conceive itself, nor throw itself through a window.
But sure, pretend it is "legal" to shoot "trespassing" babies in Texas. Whatever.
#Abortion #ProLife #DumbArgument
Dimension: 540 x 526
File Size: 22.28 Kb
Like (1)
Loading...
Angry (1)
Loading...
2