photo #6760921

🚨US V. Zackey Rahimi🚨 "A firearm regulation that falls within the Second Amendment’s plain text is unconstitutional unless it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue, 18 U. S. C. §922(g)(😎. Therefore, I respectfully dissent." Below are just a few key points raised by Justice Thomas in his dissent. 🛑Section 922(g)(😎 does not require a finding that a person has ever committed a crime of domestic violence. 🛑And, §922(g)(😎 does not distinguish contested orders from joint orders—for example, when parties voluntarily enter a no-contact agreement or when both parties seek a restraining order. 🛑Strips an individual of his ability to possess firearms and ammunition without any due process. 🛑Despite §922(g)(8)’s broad scope and lack of process, it carries strong penalties. 🛑The Government does not offer a single historical regulation that is relevantly similar to §922(g)(😎. 🛑It is undisputed that §922(g)(😎 targets conduct encompassed by the Second Amendment’s plain text. This is why we fight. To join the fight for your Second Amendment rights donate to our 2A Fund at https://silentmajorityfoundation.org/online-donations/